Klimko Christopher P, Shoe Jennifer L, Rill Nathaniel O, Hunter Melissa, Dankmeyer Jennifer L, Talyansky Yuli, Schmidt Lindsey K, Orne Caitlyn E, Fetterer David P, Biryukov Sergei S, Burtnick Mary N, Brett Paul J, DeShazer David, Cote Christopher K
Bacteriology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Aug 17;13:965572. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.965572. eCollection 2022.
, the gram-negative bacterium that causes melioidosis, is notoriously difficult to treat with antibiotics. A significant effort has focused on identifying protective vaccine strategies to prevent melioidosis. However, when used as individual medical countermeasures both antibiotic treatments (therapeutics or post-exposure prophylaxes) and experimental vaccine strategies remain partially protective. Here we demonstrate that when used in combination, current vaccine strategies (recombinant protein subunits AhpC and/or Hcp1 plus capsular polysaccharide conjugated to CRM197 or the live attenuated vaccine strain 668 Δ) and co-trimoxazole regimens can result in near uniform protection in a mouse model of melioidosis due to apparent synergy associated with distinct medical countermeasures. Our results demonstrated significant improvement when examining several suboptimal antibiotic regimens (e.g., 7-day antibiotic course started early after infection or 21-day antibiotic course with delayed initiation). Importantly, this combinatorial strategy worked similarly when either protein subunit or live attenuated vaccines were evaluated. Layered and integrated medical countermeasures will provide novel treatment options for melioidosis as well as diseases caused by other pathogens that are refractory to individual strategies, particularly in the case of engineered, emerging, or re-emerging bacterial biothreat agents.
引起类鼻疽的革兰氏阴性菌,用抗生素治疗 notoriously difficult。人们付出了巨大努力来确定预防类鼻疽的保护性疫苗策略。然而,当作为单独的医学对策使用时,抗生素治疗(治疗或暴露后预防)和实验性疫苗策略都仍具有部分保护作用。在这里,我们证明,当联合使用时,当前的疫苗策略(重组蛋白亚基AhpC和/或Hcp1加上与CRM197偶联的荚膜多糖或减毒活疫苗株668Δ)和复方新诺明方案可在类鼻疽小鼠模型中产生近乎一致的保护作用,这是由于不同医学对策之间明显的协同作用。我们的结果表明,在研究几种次优抗生素方案(例如,感染后早期开始7天抗生素疗程或延迟开始21天抗生素疗程)时,有显著改善。重要的是,当评估蛋白亚基疫苗或减毒活疫苗时,这种联合策略的效果相似。分层和综合的医学对策将为类鼻疽以及由其他对单独策略难治的病原体引起的疾病提供新的治疗选择,特别是在工程化、新出现或重新出现的细菌生物威胁制剂的情况下。