• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Analysis of clinical responses in comparison with the results of the chemosensitivity test by subrenal capsule assay].

作者信息

Inoue K, Wang Y, Itoh Y, Shibata H, Chen S C, Ogawa M

出版信息

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1987 Jul;14(7):2305-9.

PMID:3606150
Abstract

We attempted to examine the practicality and the usefulness of 6-day subrenal capsule assay (SRCA) as a predictive chemosensitivity test. The success rate of this assay was 81% in 150 cases of various cancers. The drug sensitivity was evaluated by the inhibition rate of tumor growth (TGIR) on day 6 after drug treatment without immunosuppression of mice. We analyzed the clinical response in comparison with the results of SRCA in 38 cases in which transplanted tumor showed over 1.0 tumor growth rate (TGR). The average TGIR in these cases attained CR, PR, MR, NC and PD clinically were 60, 60, 49, 53 and 40%, respectively. The TGIR of CR and PR cases were significantly greater than that of PD cases (p less than 0.05). These results in SRCA correspond to clinically observed responses, using a greater than or equal to 45% inhibition in TGIR to define 'sensitivity'. Of 26 patients sensitive in SRCA, 18 patients (69%) showed true positive and 75% of patients (12 cases) resistant in the assay also failed to respond clinically (true negative). In the cases with less than 1.0 in TGR, a correlation between clinical responses and TGIR was not found. Based on these results, 6-day SRCA without immunosuppresive procedures can be utilized as a predictive chemosensitivity test for cancers which can grow over 1.0 in TGR in this assay system.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Analysis of clinical responses in comparison with the results of the chemosensitivity test by subrenal capsule assay].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1987 Jul;14(7):2305-9.
2
[Analysis of the chemosensitivity test by subrenal capsule assay].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1987 Mar;14(3 Pt 1):653-8.
3
[Analysis of the chemosensitivity test by human tumor clonogenic assay and subrenal capsule assay].[通过人肿瘤克隆形成试验和肾包膜下移植试验进行化学敏感性试验的分析]
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1987 Nov;88(11):1554-64.
4
[A 6-day subrenal capsule assay for predictive testing of primary esophageal cancers].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1987 Apr;14(4):1106-10.
5
[Evaluation of chemosensitivity in the 6-day subrenal capsule assay].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1987 Aug;14(8):2423-30.
6
The six-day subrenal capsule assay (SRCA) for testing the response of human tumours to anticancer agents. Validity and usefulness in cancer research and treatment.
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 1985;199:51-9.
7
[Subrenal capsule assay for chemosensitivity testing].[用于化学敏感性测试的肾包膜下测定法]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1987 Apr;14(4):1143-9.
8
[Subrenal capsule assay--an experimental study and clinical application to chemosensitivity tests].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1987 May;14(5 Pt 2):1629-35.
9
The subrenal capsule assay (SRCA) and its predictive value in oncology.
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 1985;199:12-27.
10
[Clinical application of the subrenal capsule assay (SRCA) and related problems].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1987 Aug;14(8):2450-7.