Department of Pathology, AP-HP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Creteil, France.
Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, France.
Mol Oncol. 2022 Dec;16(22):3916-3926. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13311. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
IDH1 and IDH2 somatic mutations have been identified in solid tumors and blood malignancies. The development of inhibitors of mutant IDH1 and IDH2 in the past few years has prompted the development of a fast and sensitive assay to detect IDH1 , IDH2 and IDH2 mutations to identify patients eligible for these targeted therapies. This study aimed to compare two new multiplexed PCR assays - an automated quantitative PCR (qPCR) on the PGX platform and a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) with next-generation sequencing (NGS) for IDH1/2 mutation detection. These assays were evaluated on 102 DNA extracted from patient peripheral blood, bone marrow and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples with mutation allelic frequency ranging from 0.6% to 45.6%. The ddPCR assay had better analytical performances than the PGX assay with 100% specificity, 100% sensitivity and a detection limit down to 0.5% on IDH1 , IDH2 and IDH2 codons, and a high correlation with NGS results. Therefore, the new highly multiplexed ddPCR is a fast and cost-effective assay that meets most clinical needs to identify and follow cancer patients in the era of anti-IDH1/2-targeted therapies.
IDH1 和 IDH2 体细胞突变已在实体瘤和血液恶性肿瘤中被发现。在过去几年中,开发了 IDH1 和 IDH2 突变体抑制剂,这促使人们开发了一种快速而敏感的检测 IDH1、IDH2 和 IDH2 突变的方法,以确定适合这些靶向治疗的患者。本研究旨在比较两种新的多重 PCR 检测方法——PGX 平台上的自动化定量 PCR(qPCR)和带有下一代测序(NGS)的液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR),用于 IDH1/2 突变检测。这些检测方法评估了 102 例来自患者外周血、骨髓和福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织样本的 DNA,突变等位基因频率范围为 0.6%至 45.6%。ddPCR 检测方法的分析性能优于 PGX 检测方法,具有 100%的特异性、100%的敏感性和检测下限低至 0.5%的 IDH1、IDH2 和 IDH2 密码子,与 NGS 结果高度相关。因此,新的高度多重 ddPCR 是一种快速且具有成本效益的检测方法,满足了在抗 IDH1/2 靶向治疗时代识别和监测癌症患者的大多数临床需求。