• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上颌窦底提升术比较去除与保留窦腔假性囊肿:回顾性队列研究。

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing removing versus retaining antral pseudocyst: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Nov;33(11):1098-1113. doi: 10.1111/clr.13993. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1111/clr.13993
PMID:36062937
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively compare multilevel volumetric changes in both hard and soft tissues between antral pseudocyst (AP) removal and retainment before maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) and immediate implant placement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients with 38 implants placed from 2016 to 2021 were included and divided according to a cohort design as follows: 13 removing the cyst (RC group) and 13 "leaving alone" the cyst (LC group). 3D radiographic parameters (primary outcome), 2D parameters and clinical records (secondary outcome) involving both hard and soft tissues were evaluated for four periods (T1: immediate postoperative, T2: 6-month, T3: 12-month, and T4: 2- to 5- year follow-up). Possible confounding factors, including sinus anatomical features and implant distribution, were also analyzed to eliminate their disturbance.

RESULTS

The 3D volumetric change rate of bone grafts in the RC group (-9.32% ± 10.01%) from T2 to T3 was significantly lower than that in the LC group (-19.8% ± 10.59%) (p < .05). The change rate of apical bone height (ABH), endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG) and other 2D parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. 5.3% implants in RC group and 9.1% implants in LC group failed during follow-ups. 0% postoperative complications were observed in RC group. The Schneiderian membrane of RC group was significantly thinner than that of LC group at two measuring points in sinus.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that compared to AP retainment, AP removal before MSFA and immediate implant placement can obtain higher bone graft volumetric stability and favorable prognosis.

摘要

目的

回顾性比较上颌窦底提升(MSFA)及即刻种植前经窦内入路去除与保留窦底假性囊肿(AP)在硬组织和软组织方面的多层容积变化。

材料和方法

本研究共纳入了 2016 年至 2021 年期间 26 名患者的 38 个种植体,根据队列设计分为两组:13 例患者(RC 组)行囊肿切除术,13 例患者(LC 组)保留囊肿。对两组患者的 3D 影像学参数(主要结局)、硬组织和软组织的 2D 参数及临床记录(次要结局)进行评估,共分为四个时期(T1:术后即刻,T2:术后 6 个月,T3:术后 12 个月,T4:2 至 5 年随访)。同时还分析了可能影响结果的鼻窦解剖特征和种植体分布等混杂因素。

结果

RC 组患者在 T2 至 T3 期间,骨移植的 3D 容积变化率(-9.32%±10.01%)明显低于 LC 组(-19.8%±10.59%)(p<.05)。两组间根尖骨高度(ABH)、窦底骨增量(ESBG)等 2D 参数的变化率无显著差异。RC 组有 5.3%的种植体在随访过程中失败,LC 组有 9.1%的种植体失败。RC 组术后无并发症发生,而 LC 组有 1 例发生术后感染。RC 组患者的窦黏膜在两个测量点均显著薄于 LC 组。

结论

与保留 AP 相比,MSFA 及即刻种植前去除 AP 可获得更高的骨移植体积稳定性和更有利的预后。

相似文献

1
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing removing versus retaining antral pseudocyst: A retrospective cohort study.上颌窦底提升术比较去除与保留窦腔假性囊肿:回顾性队列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Nov;33(11):1098-1113. doi: 10.1111/clr.13993. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
2
Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the osteotome technique in the presence of antral pseudocysts: a retrospective study with an average follow-up of 27 months.应用骨凿技术行上颌窦底提升术治疗窦腔假性囊肿:一项平均随访 27 个月的回顾性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):408-13. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2644.
3
Endo-sinus bone gain following sinus membrane elevation without graft compared with sinus floor augmentation and a composite graft: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial.窦膜提升术后不植骨与鼻窦底增高和复合植骨的窦内骨量增加:为期一年的单盲随机对照试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Apr;53(4):319-332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.10.007. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
4
[Maxillary sinus augmentation and implant placement following removal of a maxillary antral cyst: a preliminary clinical study].上颌窦囊肿摘除术后上颌窦提升与种植体植入:一项初步临床研究
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Sep;50(9):515-21.
5
Repositioning of the bone window in lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement: A retrospective radiographic study.同期种植术中应用骨窗侧位定位抬高颅后窝底:一项回顾性影像学研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Aug;33(8):816-833. doi: 10.1111/clr.13963. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
6
A Clinical Approach for the Removal of a Large Antral Pseudocyst with Simultaneous Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Case Series.一种经临床证实的用于去除大窦腔假性囊肿同时行上颌窦提升术的方法:病例系列研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 20;60(5):838. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050838.
7
Histological and clinical outcomes of lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous removal of a maxillary sinus pseudocyst.经上颌窦假性囊肿同期去除的外侧窦底提升的组织学和临床效果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Feb;21(1):94-100. doi: 10.1111/cid.12708. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.上颌窦提升术对骨内种植体存留率的影响。一项系统评价。
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43. doi: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328.
9
Volumetric changes after sinus augmentation using blocks of autogenous iliac bone or freeze-dried allogeneic bone. A non-randomized study.使用自体髂骨块或冻干同种异体骨进行上颌窦提升术后的容积变化。一项非随机研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Mar;42(2):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 May 28.
10
Maxillary sinus floor augmentation surgery with autogenous bone grafts as ceiling: a pilot study and test of principle.以上颌窦底提升术联合自体骨移植作为上限:一项初步研究及原理验证。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Aug;15(4):550-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00409.x. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Maxillary Antral Pseudocyst Drift after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation with Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Case Report and Literature Review.骨凿法上颌窦底提升同期种植术后上颌窦假性囊肿移位:1例报告及文献复习
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 24;12(3):920. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030920.