Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern Institute for Neuroscience, 2240 Campus Drive, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States.
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, 1131 E. 2nd Street, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
Hear Res. 2022 Oct;424:108599. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108599. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
The two primary cues to sound-source location on the horizontal plane are interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs). Here we asked whether the ability to discriminate small changes in each of these interaural cues differs between the sexes. We tested one group of males (n = 43) and females (n = 94) on ITD discrimination at 0.5 kHz and a separate group of males (n = 80) and females (n = 166) on ILD discrimination at 4 kHz. None of the participants had any prior experience with psychoacoustic tasks. Testing of each participant was completed in a single testing session of 4-5 blocks of 60 trials. For ILD discrimination, the overall mean threshold, as well as the mean threshold for each block, was statistically significantly lower for males than for females. Despite that, males and females learned at an equal rate over the course of testing. For ITD discrimination, in contrast, thresholds did not differ significantly between the sexes for the overall mean or for any block. There also was no statistically significant learning across blocks for either sex. For both tasks and both sexes, the individual thresholds spanned a wide range. The presence of a statistically significant sex difference and learning for ILD but not for ITD discrimination, along with a larger effect size for ILD than for ITD discrimination, suggests that the factors responsible for these outcomes acted upon an ILD-specific neural pathway, and not upon an ITD-specific pathway, nor any pathway common to the two cues. Because the ILD and ITD specific pathways are most separable initially, the factors associated with sex and learning may have acted upon the ILD-specific pathway at an early stage.
在水平面上,声源位置的两个主要线索是耳间时间差(ITD)和耳间强度差(ILD)。在这里,我们想知道在这两种耳间线索中,个体对每种线索的小变化的辨别能力是否存在性别差异。我们在 0.5 kHz 处对一组男性(n=43)和女性(n=94)进行了 ITD 辨别测试,在 4 kHz 处对另一组男性(n=80)和女性(n=166)进行了 ILD 辨别测试。所有参与者都没有任何先前的心理声学任务经验。每个参与者的测试都在一个 4-5 个 60 次试验块的测试会议中完成。对于 ILD 辨别,男性的整体平均阈值和每个块的平均阈值都显著低于女性。尽管如此,男性和女性在测试过程中的学习速度是相等的。相比之下,对于 ITD 辨别,总体平均阈值和任何块的阈值在性别之间都没有显著差异。对于两性来说,在任何区块上也没有统计学上显著的学习。对于这两种任务和两种性别,个体的阈值范围都很广。ILD 辨别存在显著的性别差异和学习,而 ITD 辨别则没有,ILD 辨别比 ITD 辨别具有更大的效应量,这表明导致这些结果的因素作用于特定的 ILD 神经通路,而不是特定的 ITD 通路,也不是这两个线索共有的任何通路。由于最初 ITD 和 ILD 特定的通路最可分离,与性别和学习相关的因素可能在早期就作用于 ILD 特定的通路。