Suppr超能文献

一项关于学校心理健康与积极行为干预支持系统(PBIS)互联系统框架的随机对照试验:关注近端变量与学校纪律

A randomized controlled trial on the interconnected systems framework for school mental health and PBIS: Focus on proximal variables and school discipline.

作者信息

Weist Mark D, Splett Joni W, Halliday Colleen A, Gage Nicholas A, Seaman Michael A, Perkins Katherine A, Perales Kelly, Miller Elaine, Collins Darien, DiStefano Christine

机构信息

University of South Carolina, 102 Osborne Administration Building,, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

University of Florida, School of Special Education, School Psychology and Early Childhood Studies, PO Box 117050, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.

出版信息

J Sch Psychol. 2022 Oct;94:49-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

Abstract

This study reviews findings for the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the Interconnected Systems Framework (ISF) for school mental health (SMH) and Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS). Since its development in the late 2000s, the ISF has been supported by federally funded centers for SMH and PBIS, and, guided by a national workgroup, is being implemented in >50 communities in the United States. This experimental evaluation of the ISF involved an RCT implemented in 24 schools in two southeastern states, with the ISF implemented in eight schools, PBIS alone implemented in eight schools, and typically co-located PBIS+SMH implemented in eight schools. Related to very poor implementation, documented by two sources of fidelity data, two ISF schools were dropped from major analyses; hence, the study used a treatment on the treated (ToT; Rubin, 1974) as compared to a more traditional Intent-to-Treat approach (ITT; Lachin, 2000). This is the first paper from this large study, with emphasis here on proximal variables and school discipline. Within schools' multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS), ISF schools delivered more Tier 2 (early intervention) and Tier 3 (treatment) interventions to a greater proportion of students than the other two conditions by the second year of the intervention. There was also a dramatic difference in the provision of interventions by community mental health clinicians in ISF schools (almost half of interventions delivered) as compared to PBIS+SMH schools (around 3% of interventions delivered), underscoring the critical role of the ISF in integrating clinicians into MTSS teams and core school functions in SMH. As compared to the other two conditions, ISF schools also had reduced office discipline referrals (ODRs) and in-school suspensions, as well as reduced ODRs and out-of-school suspensions for African American students. Findings are discussed in relation to future directions of education-mental health system partnerships in improving the delivery and impact of SMH programs and services, demonstrated in the ISF.

摘要

本研究回顾了关于学校心理健康(SMH)互联系统框架(ISF)和积极行为干预与支持(PBIS)的首个随机对照试验(RCT)的结果。自21世纪末开发以来,ISF得到了联邦政府资助的学校心理健康和PBIS中心的支持,并在一个全国工作组的指导下,在美国50多个社区实施。对ISF的这一实验性评估涉及在东南部两个州的24所学校进行的一项随机对照试验,其中8所学校实施ISF,8所学校单独实施PBIS,8所学校实施通常同地开展的PBIS+SMH。由于有两个信效度数据来源记录实施情况非常差,两所实施ISF的学校被排除在主要分析之外;因此,该研究采用了“处理的处理”(ToT;鲁宾,1974年)方法,而不是更传统的意向性处理方法(ITT;拉钦,2000年)。这是这项大型研究的第一篇论文,这里重点关注近端变量和学校纪律。在学校的多层支持系统(MTSS)中,到干预的第二年,与其他两种情况相比,实施ISF的学校为更大比例的学生提供了更多的二级(早期干预)和三级(治疗)干预。与PBIS+SMH学校(约3%的干预)相比,实施ISF的学校中社区心理健康临床医生提供的干预也有显著差异(近一半的干预),这凸显了ISF在将临床医生纳入MTSS团队以及学校心理健康核心功能方面的关键作用。与其他两种情况相比,实施ISF的学校还减少了校内纪律转介(ODR)和校内停学,以及非裔美国学生的ODR和校外停学。研究结果结合教育-心理健康系统伙伴关系在改善学校心理健康项目和服务的提供及影响方面的未来方向进行了讨论,ISF中体现了这些方向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验