Bhardwaj Praveen, Venkatramani Hari, Sivakumar Brahman, Graham David J, Vigneswaran Varadharajan, Sabapathy S Raja
Department of Plastic, Hand and Microsurgery, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospital Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore, India.
Department of Hand and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, New South Wales, Australia; Australian Research Collaboration on Hands, Mudgeeraba, Queensland, Australia; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Hornsby, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia; Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, the Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Syndey, Australia.
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Oct;47(10):970-978. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
The restoration of elbow flexion is of primary importance in the management of patients with brachial plexus injuries. Superior functional outcomes via fascicle transfer from the ulnar and median nerves have resulted in this transfer being considered the mainstay of recovery of elbow flexion in patients with intact C8 and T1 function. An understanding of the anatomy of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) and its branching pattern is key while performing these transfers.
A prospective cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent nerve transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion following a traumatic brachial plexus injury. The anatomic course and branching pattern of the MCN were recorded in eligible cases, both as a line diagram and using intraoperative photographs.
One hundred fifty patients underwent nerve transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion following an injury to the brachial plexus. The MCN in 138 patients (92%) was found to pierce the coracobrachialis muscle before emerging lateral to it. One hundred thirty-four patients (89.3%) demonstrated the "classical" anatomy. One hundred fifteen patients (76.6%) had a single primary branch to the biceps, whereas 25 patients (16.6%) demonstrated a discrete motor branch to each head. One hundred thirty-three dissections (88.6%) revealed a single muscular branch to the brachialis arising posteromedially from the MCN, distal to the origin of the branch to the biceps brachii. Notable unreported variations, such as the MCN penetrating the biceps as it descended, multiple brachialis branches, and trifurcation of divisions of the MCN, were documented.
Variations in MCN anatomy are quite common, and even unreported variations can be encountered.
Exploration of the MCN and its branches for nerve transfers requires knowledge of these anatomic variations and vigilance to prevent inadvertent injuries while dissecting them for nerve transfer surgery.
恢复肘关节屈曲功能在臂丛神经损伤患者的治疗中至关重要。通过尺神经和正中神经束支移位实现的良好功能结果,使这种移位被视为C8和T1功能完整的臂丛神经损伤患者恢复肘关节屈曲功能的主要方法。在进行这些移位手术时,了解肌皮神经(MCN)的解剖结构及其分支模式是关键。
对因创伤性臂丛神经损伤接受神经移位以恢复肘关节屈曲功能的患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。在符合条件的病例中,以线图和术中照片的形式记录了MCN的解剖行程和分支模式。
150例患者因臂丛神经损伤接受了神经移位以恢复肘关节屈曲功能。发现138例患者(92%)的MCN在穿出喙肱肌之前先穿过该肌。134例患者(89.3%)表现出“经典”解剖结构。115例患者(76.6%)有一条至肱二头肌的单一主要分支,而25例患者(16.6%)表现为至肱二头肌每个头的独立运动分支。133例解剖(88.6%)显示有一条至肱肌的单一肌支,该肌支从MCN后内侧发出,位于至肱二头肌分支的起点远端。记录了一些值得注意的未报告变异,如MCN下行时穿过肱二头肌、多条肱肌分支以及MCN分支的三叉分支。
MCN解剖结构的变异相当常见,甚至可能遇到未报告的变异。
在进行神经移位手术时,探查MCN及其分支需要了解这些解剖变异,并在解剖时保持警惕以防止意外损伤。