• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Safety aspects of prehospital thoracic emergency procedures: Results of a survey among German emergency physicians].

作者信息

Metelmann Isabella B, Metelmann Bibiana, Metelmann Camilla, Steimle Nina, Rübsam Marie-Luise, Krämer Bernd, Krämer Sebastian

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Bereich Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Klinik für Anästhesie, Intensiv-, Notfall- und Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald KöR, Greifswald, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Nov;174:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2022.08.002
PMID:36064703
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The safe indication and performance of thoracic emergency procedures are crucial and potentially lifesaving in prehospital emergency care. This study aims to investigate issues of patient safety and quality assurance of prehospital invasive thoracic interventions. The survey does not represent the actual medical care situation but explores reasons for security concerns among emergency physicians.

METHODS

Using a pre-validated questionnaire, prehospital emergency physicians of three prehospital rescue associations (Zweckverband) in Southwest Saxony, Greifswald, and Vechta, Germany, were queried via the online survey service limesurvey. The survey was conducted between January and March 2022.

RESULTS

104 emergency physicians participated (response rate 42.4%) 71 of which fully completed the survey (68%). 79% of the participants stated that they felt safe in performing pleural punction. Common reasons for postponing prehospital thoracic interventions included fear of complications or individual patient characteristics. 90% said that they were familiar with the on-board equipment options, and 60% reported that resources were sufficient to perform double-sided procedures. While in all three regions there is sufficient on-board equipment to perform procedures on two sides, one out of two participants said that lack of equipment deters them from performing prehospital invasive thoracic procedures. Emergency physicians who graduated from trauma courses and/or participate in air rescue are more likely to perform invasive thoracic procedures. More than half of the participants wanted more training in chest tube placement or pleural punction.

CONCLUSION

Safety in prehospital invasive thoracic procedures needs improvement in structural, procedural, as well as human factors aspects. Safe handling of these rare but vital techniques requires more training. A lack of knowledge of equipment is a significant safety gap. Prehospital ultrasound constitutes a structural element of prehospital diagnostics.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Safety aspects of prehospital thoracic emergency procedures: Results of a survey among German emergency physicians].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Nov;174:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
2
[Prehospital chest tube placement: Which factors are associated with feeling confident to perform the procedure?].[院前胸腔闭式引流管置入:哪些因素与对执行该操作有信心相关?]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 May;186:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
[Prehospital treatment of tension pneumothorax in children-which decisions do we make? : Results of a survey among German emergency physicians].[儿童张力性气胸的院前治疗——我们做出了哪些决策?:德国急诊医生的调查结果]
Anaesthesist. 2021 Nov;70(11):928-936. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-00966-z. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
4
Subjective safety and self-confidence in prehospital trauma care and learning progress after trauma-courses: part of the prospective longitudinal mixed-methods EPPTC-trial.主观安全性和创伤护理前的自信心,以及创伤课程后的学习进展:前瞻性纵向混合方法 EPPTC 试验的一部分。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Aug 14;25(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0426-5.
5
[Reasons for non-participation in a patient survey in the context of prehospital emergency medical care by community emergency paramedics - A retrospective observational study].[社区急救护理人员在院前急救护理中不参与患者调查的原因——一项回顾性观察研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Jun;187:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
6
Understanding safety in prehospital emergency medical services for children.了解儿童院前急救医疗服务中的安全性。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):350-8. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.869640. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
7
Second Victims among German Emergency Medical Services Physicians (SeViD-III-Study).德国急救医疗服务医师中的第二受害者(SeViD-III 研究)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054267.
8
Children's safety initiative: a national assessment of pediatric educational needs among emergency medical services providers.儿童安全倡议:对紧急医疗服务提供者的儿科教育需求进行的全国性评估。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2):287-91. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.959223. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
9
[Introduction of Prehospital Emergency Ultrasound into an Emergency Medical Service Area].[将院前急诊超声引入一个紧急医疗服务区]
Anaesthesist. 2017 Jan;66(1):21-27. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0248-2. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
10
Realistic assessment of the physician-staffed emergency services in Germany.对德国配备医生的急诊服务进行现实评估。
Anaesthesist. 2006 Oct;55(10):1080-6. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-1051-2.