Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Injury. 2022 Nov;53(11):3814-3819. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.045. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
Tibial plateau fractures with an ipsilateral compartment syndrome are a clinical challenge with limited guidance regarding the best time to perform open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) relative to fasciotomy wound closure. This study aimed to determine if the risk of fracture-related infection (FRI) differs based on the timing of tibial plateau ORIF relative to closure of ipsilateral fasciotomy wounds.
A retrospective cohort study identified patients with tibial plateau fractures and an ipsilateral compartment syndrome treated with 4-compartment fasciotomy at 22 US trauma centers from 2009 to 2019. The primary outcome measure was FRI requiring operative debridement after ORIF. The ORIF timing relative to fasciotomy closure was categorized as ORIF before, at the same time as, or after fasciotomy closure. Bayesian hierarchical regression models with a neutral prior were used to determine the association between timing of ORIF and infection. The posterior probability of treatment benefit for ORIF was also determined for the three timings of ORIF relative to fasciotomy closure.
Of the 729 patients who underwent ORIF of their tibial plateau fracture, 143 (19.6%) subsequently developed a FRI requiring operative treatment. Patients sustaining infections were: 21.0% of those with ORIF before (43 of 205), 15.9% at the same time as (37 of 232), and 21.6% after fasciotomy wound closure (63 of 292). ORIF at the same time as fasciotomy closure demonstrated a 91% probability of being superior to before closure (RR, 0.75; 95% CrI, 0.38 to 1.10). ORIF after fasciotomy closure had a lower likelihood (45%) of a superior outcome than before closure (RR, 1.02; 95% CrI; 0.64 to 1.39).
Data from this multicenter cohort confirms previous reports of a high FRI risk in patients with a tibial plateau fracture and ipsilateral compartment syndrome. Our results suggest that ORIF at the time of fasciotomy closure has the highest probability of treatment benefit, but that infection was common with all three timings of ORIF in this difficult clinical situation.
胫骨平台骨折合并同侧筋膜间室综合征是临床面临的挑战,对于切开复位内固定(ORIF)相对于筋膜切开伤口闭合的最佳时机,相关指导有限。本研究旨在确定胫骨平台 ORIF 相对于同侧筋膜切开伤口闭合的时间是否会影响骨折相关感染(FRI)的风险。
一项回顾性队列研究,共纳入了 22 家美国创伤中心 2009 年至 2019 年期间接受 4 间隙筋膜切开术治疗的胫骨平台骨折合并同侧筋膜间室综合征患者。主要结局指标为 ORIF 后需要手术清创的 FRI。ORIF 相对于筋膜切开关闭的时间分类为 ORIF 前、同时和筋膜切开关闭后。采用具有中立先验的贝叶斯层次回归模型来确定 ORIF 时间与感染之间的关联。还确定了相对于筋膜切开关闭,ORIF 三种时间的治疗获益的后验概率。
在接受胫骨平台骨折 ORIF 的 729 名患者中,有 143 名(19.6%)随后发生了需要手术治疗的 FRI。发生感染的患者中,ORIF 前(43 例,205 例)、同时(37 例,232 例)和筋膜切开关闭后(63 例,292 例)的感染率分别为 21.0%、15.9%和 21.6%。ORIF 与筋膜切开同时进行的疗效优于 ORIF 前关闭(RR,0.75;95%CrI,0.38 至 1.10)。筋膜切开关闭后进行 ORIF 的疗效更差(45%),不如 ORIF 前关闭(RR,1.02;95%CrI,0.64 至 1.39)。
这项多中心队列研究的数据证实了先前关于胫骨平台骨折合并同侧筋膜间室综合征患者 FRI 风险高的报道。我们的结果表明,筋膜切开时进行 ORIF 具有最高的治疗获益可能性,但在这种困难的临床情况下,三种 ORIF 时机均常见感染。