• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为教师开发数字能力量表:效度与信度研究。

Developing a digital competence scale for teachers: validity and reliability study.

作者信息

Gümüş Muhammed Murat, Kukul Volkan

机构信息

Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies, Amasya University, 05100 Amasya, Turkey.

出版信息

Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(3):2747-2765. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11213-2. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10639-022-11213-2
PMID:36065300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9433515/
Abstract

Teachers' digital competence is very significant in terms of integrating digital technologies into the education process. This study aims to develop an up-to-date scale that can determine the digital competencies required for teachers to acquire new skills that arise with the change and development of technology and use them in educational environments. A total of 695 teachers participated in the study. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the construct validity of the scale. To assess the discrimination index of the items, the lower 27% and upper 27% groups were determined, and the differences between the groups were examined. Internal consistency coefficients were calculated for the reliability analysis. According to the results of the analysis, the developed scale consists of six factors and 46 items, and the Cronbach Alpha coefficient of the entire scale is 0.975. The factors were identified as "Safety," "Data Literacy," "Problem Solving," "Digital Content Creation," "Communication and Collaboration," and "Ethics," respectively, according to the content of the items. When compared with the DigComp 2.1 framework developed by the European Union, it was determined that the ethical factor emerged differently in this study. As a result, it can be said that the Digital Competency Scale for Teachers is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to measure teachers' digital competencies.

摘要

教师的数字能力对于将数字技术融入教育过程非常重要。本研究旨在开发一个最新的量表,以确定教师获得随着技术变革和发展而产生的新技能并在教育环境中使用这些技能所需的数字能力。共有695名教师参与了该研究。探索性和验证性因素分析用于检验量表的结构效度。为了评估项目的区分指数,确定了得分较低的27%和得分较高的27%的组,并检验了两组之间的差异。计算内部一致性系数以进行信度分析。根据分析结果,所开发的量表由六个因素和46个项目组成,整个量表的克朗巴哈α系数为0.975。根据项目内容,这些因素分别被确定为“安全”“数据素养”“问题解决”“数字内容创作”“沟通与协作”和“伦理”。与欧盟开发的DigComp 2.1框架相比,本研究中伦理因素的呈现有所不同。因此,可以说教师数字能力量表是一个有效且可靠的量表,可用于衡量教师的数字能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3327/9433515/d7813897ba9a/10639_2022_11213_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3327/9433515/aab2702115db/10639_2022_11213_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3327/9433515/d7813897ba9a/10639_2022_11213_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3327/9433515/aab2702115db/10639_2022_11213_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3327/9433515/d7813897ba9a/10639_2022_11213_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a digital competence scale for teachers: validity and reliability study.为教师开发数字能力量表:效度与信度研究。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(3):2747-2765. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11213-2. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
2
The HeDiCom framework: Higher Education teachers' digital competencies for the future.赫迪康框架:未来高等教育教师的数字能力
Educ Technol Res Dev. 2023;71(1):33-53. doi: 10.1007/s11423-023-10193-5. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3
Teachers' digital competences: a scale construction and validation study.教师的数字能力:一项量表构建与验证研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 16;15:1356573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356573. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessing teachers' digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements for digital education.评估中小学教师的数字能力:应用一种新工具整合数字教育的教学和专业要素。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 May 5:1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11848-9.
5
Digital competency mapping dataset of pre-service teachers in Indonesia.
Data Brief. 2023 Jun 13;49:109310. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109310. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Does teacher's data literacy and digital teaching competence influence empowering students in the classroom? Evidence from China.教师的数据素养和数字教学能力是否会影响课堂上对学生的赋能?来自中国的证据。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(3):2845-2867. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11274-3. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
7
Automated Monitoring of Human-Computer Interaction for Assessing Teachers' Digital Competence Based on LMS Data Extraction.基于学习管理系统(LMS)数据提取的人机交互自动监测以评估教师的数字能力
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 23;24(11):3326. doi: 10.3390/s24113326.
8
Teachers' perceptions of digital competence at the lifelong learning stage.教师对终身学习阶段数字能力的认知。
Heliyon. 2021 Jul 8;7(7):e07513. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07513. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Development of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument: Measuring a Broad Spectrum of Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 Skills.数字健康素养工具的开发:衡量广泛的健康1.0和健康2.0技能
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 24;19(1):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6709.
10
A study of the impact of the new digital divide on the ICT competences of rural and urban secondary school teachers in China.一项关于新数字鸿沟对中国城乡中学教师信息通信技术能力影响的研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 6;10(7):e29186. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29186. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status and associated factors of digital literacy among academic nurse educators: a cross-sectional study.学术护理教育工作者数字素养的现状及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 3;25(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06624-3.
2
Teachers' digital competences: a scale construction and validation study.教师的数字能力:一项量表构建与验证研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 16;15:1356573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356573. eCollection 2024.