• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同角度钛基台支持的 CAD-CAM 陶瓷冠的抗折强度和破坏类型的评估。

Evaluation of the fracture resistance and failure types of different CAD-CAM ceramic crowns supported by angled titanium abutments.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2023 Aug;32(7):594-601. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13596. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1111/jopr.13596
PMID:36065985
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the fatigue resistance of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) single-ceramic crowns which were applied on angled implant abutments after thermomechanical aging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Titanium abutments (N = 72, MODE Medical Dental Implant, Turkey) with three different angles (0˚, 15°, and 25°) were restored using different materials (monolithic zirconia [Zir], lithium silicate ceramic reinforced by zirconia [VS], and hybrid ceramic [VE]). Crowns in the maxillary first premolar form were cemented to abutments using resin cement (Panavia 2.0 Introkit). Dynamic loading and thermomechanical aging were applied to the specimens (120,000 cycles, 49 N, 5-55°C). Fracture resistance values were measured in the universal test machine and fracture types were determined. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey test were used for statistical analysis (Jamovi version 2.3.5).

RESULTS

Both the abutment angle and the type of material had a significant effect on fracture resistance (F = 3.295, p < 0.05). The highest fracture resistance was obtained in Group 0˚-Zir, and the lowest fracture resistance was obtained in Group 15˚-VE. Fracture resistance showed significant differences between Group 0˚ and Group 15˚ for the Zir and VE materials, and between Group 0˚ and Group 25˚ for VS (p < 0.05); no statistical significance was determined between the other groups (p>0.05). When failure types were evaluated, they were seen to be full or partial crown fractures, and abutment deformation was found in some samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Monolithic crowns may be preferred on angled abutments. The fracture resistance of CAD-CAM materials decreases as the angle of abutments increases. Monolithic zirconia has higher fracture resistance than other materials.

摘要

目的

评估经热机械老化后应用于带角度种植体基台的计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)单陶瓷冠的耐疲劳性能。

材料和方法

使用不同材料(整体氧化锆[Zir]、氧化锆增强锂硅陶瓷[VS]和混合陶瓷[VE])对具有三种不同角度(0˚、15˚和 25˚)的钛基台(土耳其 MODE Medical Dental Implant)进行修复。以上颌第一前磨牙形式制作的牙冠用树脂粘接剂(Panavia 2.0 Introkit)粘接到基台上。对试件进行动态加载和热机械老化(120,000 次循环,49N,5-55°C)。在万能试验机上测量断裂阻力值,并确定断裂类型。使用双向方差分析和 Tukey 检验进行统计分析(Jamovi 版本 2.3.5)。

结果

基台角度和材料类型均对断裂阻力有显著影响(F = 3.295,p < 0.05)。0˚-Zir 组的断裂阻力最高,15˚-VE 组的断裂阻力最低。Zir 和 VE 材料中,0˚组和 15˚组之间的断裂阻力差异有统计学意义,VS 材料中,0˚组和 25˚组之间的断裂阻力差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05);其他组之间无统计学差异(p > 0.05)。当评估失效类型时,发现它们是全冠或部分冠断裂,以及一些样本中的基台变形。

结论

在带角度的基台上可能更倾向于使用整体冠。随着基台角度的增加,CAD-CAM 材料的断裂阻力降低。整体氧化锆的断裂阻力高于其他材料。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the fracture resistance and failure types of different CAD-CAM ceramic crowns supported by angled titanium abutments.不同角度钛基台支持的 CAD-CAM 陶瓷冠的抗折强度和破坏类型的评估。
J Prosthodont. 2023 Aug;32(7):594-601. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13596. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
2
Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.钛、氧化锆和陶瓷增强聚醚醚酮种植体基台支持 CAD/CAM 整体式氧化锂硅陶瓷冠在老化后的抗折强度。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 May/June;34(3):622–630. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7036. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
3
Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.氧化锆中桥接基台与不同整体式全瓷冠修复的钛基的机械稳定性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 September/October;34(5):1091–1097. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7431. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
4
Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.疲劳后整体式二硅酸锂植入物支持的单冠与钛基基台粘结与定制陶瓷基台粘结的失败负荷。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):136-146. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13369. Epub 2021 May 4.
5
Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.钛和氧化锆种植体基台烤瓷冠的抗折裂性能:全瓷单体冠与手工堆塑烤瓷冠的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1448-55.
6
Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.新型种植体-冠界面上全个性化、无基台氧化锆种植体冠的机械稳定性。
J Dent. 2022 Jun;121:104121. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104121. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Supported by Titanium and Ti-Base Abutments: The Effect of Chewing Simulation and Thermocyclic Aging.CAD/CAM 整体氧化锆冠在钛和钛基基台支持下的抗折裂性能:咀嚼模拟和热循环老化的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Mar-Apr;38(2):328-333. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9693.
8
Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.陶瓷增强型聚醚醚酮(PEEK)基台修复单块氧化锆全瓷冠替代常规美学基台的疲劳和应力分布分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 May-Jun;37(3):533-542. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9334.
9
Fracture Resistance of Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone, and Polyetherketoneketone Implant Abutments After Aging.氧化锆、聚醚醚酮和聚醚酮酮种植体基台在老化后的抗折强度。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Mar-Apr;36(2):332-340. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9007.
10
Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.不同陶瓷种植体基台的疲劳载荷及失效模式的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jun;127(6):875-881. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.059. Epub 2021 Jan 19.