A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Autism Res. 2022 Oct;15(10):1787-1793. doi: 10.1002/aur.2792. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
Although there is consensus in the field that individuals on the autism spectrum should receive interventions that are evidence-based, the concept of "evidence-based" is multifaceted and subject to ongoing development and debate. In this commentary, we review historical developments, methodological approaches, as well as areas of controversies and research directions in the establishment of an evidence base for autism intervention. LAY SUMMARY: What does it mean for an autism intervention to be evidence-based? In this commentary, we address this complex issue by examining historical developments, methodological approaches, as well as areas of ongoing debate in the establishment of evidence-based interventions for autism.
尽管该领域已经达成共识，认为自闭症谱系个体应该接受基于证据的干预措施，但“基于证据”的概念具有多面性，并且还在不断发展和争论中。在这篇评论中，我们回顾了自闭症干预措施建立证据基础的历史发展、方法学方法以及争议和研究方向。
简要译文：自闭症干预措施的“基于证据”是什么意思？在这篇评论中，我们通过检查自闭症干预措施建立证据基础的历史发展、方法学方法以及当前的争议领域，来解决这个复杂的问题。
