Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
Turk Neurosurg. 2023;33(1):70-76. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.37439-21.1.
To investigate the possible reasons of failed conservative treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Sagittal balance impairment may weaken union by increasing the load on the fracture line. Most osteoporotic vertebral fractures occur in the thoracolumbar and mid-thoracic regions.
We investigated the records of patients aged > 60 years who underwent treatment for osteoporotic thoracolumbar VCFs between 2012 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: those who required surgical treatment due to the failure of conservative treatment and those who were successfully treated with conservative treatment. All the patients underwent lateral radiography and computer tomography of the whole spine at their initial and final visit. The radiographic parameters of spine and presence of sarcopenia, age, and gender were compared between the groups.
Of the study subjects, the mean age of 13 females and 7 males in whom conservative treatment was successful was 67.4 years and the mean follow-up period was 23.5 months, while in 18 females and 5 males who underwent surgical treatment due to the failure of conservative treatment, the mean age was 68.7 years and the mean follow-up period was 22.1 months. No significant differences between the groups regarding age and gender were observed. However, significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the presence of sarcopenia and thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis and distance from the center of the fractured vertebra to the plumb line (DSVA).
Sarcopenia and DSVA were significantly higher in the surgical treatment group. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of DSVA for identifying high-risk patients for failed conservative treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar VCFs were 100% and 95%, respectively, with an optimum diagnostic cutoff value of 6.5 mm.
探讨骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折(VCF)保守治疗失败的可能原因。矢状位平衡的破坏可能会通过增加骨折线的负荷而使愈合减弱。大多数骨质疏松性椎体骨折发生在胸腰椎和中胸段。
我们调查了 2012 年至 2020 年间接受骨质疏松性胸腰椎 VCF 治疗的年龄>60 岁患者的记录。将患者分为两组:因保守治疗失败而需要手术治疗的患者和成功接受保守治疗的患者。所有患者在初始和末次就诊时均接受侧位 X 线和全脊柱 CT 检查。比较两组患者脊柱影像学参数、存在肌肉减少症、年龄和性别。
在成功接受保守治疗的 13 名女性和 7 名男性患者中,平均年龄为 67.4 岁,平均随访时间为 23.5 个月,而在 18 名女性和 5 名因保守治疗失败而接受手术治疗的患者中,平均年龄为 68.7 岁,平均随访时间为 22.1 个月。两组患者在年龄和性别方面无显著差异。然而,两组在肌肉减少症、胸椎后凸、胸腰椎后凸和骨折椎体中心到铅垂线的距离(DSVA)方面存在显著差异。
手术治疗组的肌肉减少症和 DSVA 明显更高。受试者工作特征分析表明,DSVA 对识别骨质疏松性胸腰椎 VCF 保守治疗失败的高危患者的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%和 95%,最佳诊断截断值为 6.5mm。