• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

细节决定成败:剖析系统评价中的系统性:对重新审视指导预防青少年犯罪再犯有效性的简短回应

The devil is in the details: Unpackaging the systematic in systematic reviews: Short reply to reconsidering the effectiveness of mentoring for prevention of juvenile criminal recidivism.

作者信息

Olsson Tina M, Sundell Knut, Leander Lina

机构信息

Department of Social Work, University of Gothenburg.

Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Aug;90(8):652-654. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000748.

DOI:10.1037/ccp0000748
PMID:36066867
Abstract

Replies to a comment made by DuBois (see record 2022-98051-005). The systematic review is an important tool for decision makers, intervention researchers, and practitioners to gain a clear and comprehensive overview of the available evidence on a given topic. We would, in this short reply, like to raise the two additional issues of critical appraisal and research synthesis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

对杜波依斯的一条评论的回复(见记录2022-98051-005)。系统评价是决策者、干预研究者和从业者了解某一特定主题现有证据的清晰而全面概述的重要工具。在这篇简短的回复中,我们想提出关键评估和研究综合这两个额外的问题。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
The devil is in the details: Unpackaging the systematic in systematic reviews: Short reply to reconsidering the effectiveness of mentoring for prevention of juvenile criminal recidivism.细节决定成败:剖析系统评价中的系统性:对重新审视指导预防青少年犯罪再犯有效性的简短回应
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Aug;90(8):652-654. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000748.
2
Reconsidering the effectiveness of mentoring for prevention of juvenile criminal recidivism: A brief comment on systematic review and meta-analysis of noninstitutional psychosocial interventions to prevent juvenile criminal recidivism (Olsson et al., 2021).重新审视辅导对预防青少年犯罪再犯的有效性:对预防青少年犯罪再犯的非机构性心理社会干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析的简要评论(奥尔松等人,2021年)
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Aug;90(8):647-651. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000744.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of noninstitutional psychosocial interventions to prevent juvenile criminal recidivism.系统评价和荟萃分析非机构心理社会干预措施预防青少年犯罪复发。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Jun;89(6):514-527. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000652.
4
Juvenile reentry and aftercare interventions: is mentoring a promising direction?青少年重新融入社会及后续照护干预措施:指导是否是一个有前景的方向?
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2014;11(4):404-22. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2014.897115.
5
Mentoring Pediatric Victims of Interpersonal Violence Reduces Recidivism.对人际暴力的儿科受害者进行指导可降低累犯率。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(21-22):4262-4275. doi: 10.1177/0886260517705662. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
6
The Effectiveness of Mental Health Courts in Reducing Recidivism and Police Contact: A Systematic Review.心理健康法院在减少累犯和警察接触方面的有效性:系统评价。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 Oct;55(7):1073-1098. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00421-9. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
7
The effectiveness of mental health courts in reducing recidivism and police contact: a systematic review protocol.心理健康法庭在减少累犯和警方接触方面的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 27;5(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0291-8.
8
Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth.测试性虐待青少年犯罪风险评估工具的有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Nov;30(11):1430-1443. doi: 10.1037/pas0000590. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.系统评价的总结:伞状综述方法的方法学发展、实施与报告
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.
10
Assessing dynamic violence risk: Common language risk levels and recidivism rates for the Violence Risk Scale.评估动态暴力风险:《暴力风险量表》的常见语言风险水平和累犯率。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Jun;34(6):528-545. doi: 10.1037/pas0001116. Epub 2022 Feb 17.