Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Pharmacy Services, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2230043. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30043.
Intravenous (IV) insulin infusion is the standard of care for treating diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) worldwide. Subcutaneous (SC) insulin aspart could decrease the use of health care resources.
To compare the cost-effectiveness of mild uncomplicated DKA management with SC insulin aspart vs IV insulin infusion among pediatric patients from the perspective of a public health care payer using clinical data.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This economic evaluation included children aged 2 to 14 years presenting to the emergency department of a single academic medical center with mild DKA between January 1, 2015, and March 15, 2020. The medical records for DKA treatment course and its associated hospitalization costs were reviewed. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2015, to March 15, 2020.
Subcutaneous insulin aspart vs IV regular insulin infusion.
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (US dollars per hour), duration of DKA treatment, and length of hospital stay.
A total of 129 children with mild DKA episodes (mean [SD] age, 9.9 [3.1] years; 72 girls [55.8%]) were enrolled in the study. Seventy children received SC insulin aspart and 59 received IV regular insulin. Overall, the length of hospital stay in the SC insulin group was reduced (mean, 16.9 [95% CI, -31.0 to -2.9] hours) compared with the IV insulin group (P = .005). The mean (SD) cost of hospitalization in the SC insulin group (US $1071.99 [US $523.89]) was less than that in the IV insulin group (US $1648.90 [US $788.03]; P = .001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was -34.08 (95% CI, -25.97 to -129.82) USD/h. The use of SC insulin aspart was associated with a lower likelihood of prolonged hospital stay (β = -17.22 [95% CI, -32.41 to -2.04]; P = .03) than IV regular insulin when controlling for age and sex.
Findings of this economic evaluation suggest that SC insulin aspart is dominant vs IV regular insulin in the management of mild uncomplicated DKA in children.
背景:静脉内(IV)胰岛素输注是治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的标准治疗方法,在全球范围内都在使用。皮下(SC)胰岛素Aspart 可减少医疗资源的使用。
目的:本项经济评价使用临床数据,从公共医疗保健支付者的角度,比较儿童轻度非复杂性 DKA 管理中使用 SC 胰岛素 Aspart 与 IV 胰岛素输注的成本效益。
设计、地点和参与者:本项经济评价纳入了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 15 日期间因轻度 DKA 到一家学术医疗中心急诊科就诊的年龄在 2 至 14 岁的儿童患者。回顾了 DKA 治疗过程及其相关住院费用的医疗记录。数据分析于 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 15 日进行。
暴露:SC 胰岛素 Aspart 与 IV 普通胰岛素输注。
主要结局和措施:增量成本效果比(每小时美元)、DKA 治疗持续时间和住院时间。
结果:共纳入 129 例轻度 DKA 发作的儿童(平均[标准差]年龄 9.9[3.1]岁;72 名女孩[55.8%])。70 例患者接受 SC 胰岛素 Aspart,59 例患者接受 IV 普通胰岛素。总体而言,与 IV 胰岛素组相比,SC 胰岛素组的住院时间更短(平均减少 16.9[95%CI,-31.0 至-2.9]小时)(P=0.005)。SC 胰岛素组的住院费用均值(SD)(1071.99 美元[523.89 美元])低于 IV 胰岛素组(1648.90 美元[788.03 美元])(P=0.001)。增量成本效果比为-34.08(95%CI,-25.97 至-129.82)美元/小时。当控制年龄和性别因素时,与 IV 普通胰岛素相比,SC 胰岛素 Aspart 与更短的住院时间相关(β=-17.22[95%CI,-32.41 至-2.04];P=0.03)。
结论:本经济评价结果表明,在儿童轻度非复杂性 DKA 的治疗中,与 IV 普通胰岛素相比,SC 胰岛素 Aspart 是一种更具优势的治疗选择。