Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany.
J Med Chem. 2022 Sep 22;65(18):12403-12416. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01075. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
Organic cation transporters (OCTs) 1, 2, and 3 facilitate cellular uptake of structurally diverse endogenous and exogenous substances. However, their substrate and inhibitor specificity are not fully understood. We performed a broad screening for OCT3 substrates and inhibitors, allowing us to compare the substrate spectra and to study the relationship between transport and inhibition of transport. Generally, substrates were smaller and more hydrophilic than OCT3 inhibitors. The best model-based predictor of transport was the positive charge, while the best predictor of inhibition was the aromatic ring count. OCT3 inhibition was well correlated between different model substrates. Substrates of OCT3 were mainly weak inhibitors, and the best inhibitors were not substrates. As tested with 264 substances, OCT3 transport had significantly more overlap with OCT2 than OCT1. Our data further substantiate that specificity of OCT transport varies with minor substitutions rather than with the general scaffolds of substrates.
有机阳离子转运体(OCTs)1、2 和 3 促进结构多样的内源性和外源性物质的细胞摄取。然而,它们的底物和抑制剂特异性尚未完全阐明。我们进行了广泛的 OCT3 底物和抑制剂筛选,使我们能够比较转运的底物谱,并研究转运和抑制之间的关系。一般来说,底物比 OCT3 抑制剂更小,更亲水。转运的最佳基于模型的预测因子是正电荷,而抑制的最佳预测因子是芳环数。OCT3 抑制在不同的模型底物之间具有良好的相关性。OCT3 的底物主要是弱抑制剂,而最佳抑制剂不是底物。用 264 种物质进行测试,OCT3 的转运与 OCT2 的重叠比 OCT1 更多。我们的数据进一步证实,OCT 转运的特异性随细微取代而变化,而不是随底物的一般支架变化。