Dorsch M M, Woodward A J, Somers R L
Accid Anal Prev. 1987 Jun;19(3):183-90. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90002-9.
In the past, evaluation of helmet efficacy has been based on laboratory tests of limited relevance to real crashes. In the present study 894 South Australian bicycling enthusiasts returned mail questionnaires about their most recent bicycle crash and their helmet use at the time. 197 bicyclists reported a crash within the past five years in which they had struck their head or helmet. Helmet status at the time of the crash was reported as: no helmet used (n = 75), hairnet-style helmet (n = 69), hard-shell with soft or no liner (n = 37), or hard-shell helmet with stiff liner (n = 16). Analysis of the crude, unadjusted data showed a statistically significant association between helmet use and reduced severity of head injury. The association persisted after adjustment for age and sex of rider, and severity of crash forces. Using an unpublished method developed by Somers, it was estimated that the risk of death from head injury was considerably reduced for helmeted relative to unhelmeted bicyclists, depending on helmet type.
过去,头盔功效的评估是基于与实际碰撞相关性有限的实验室测试。在本研究中,894名南澳大利亚自行车爱好者通过邮件问卷反馈了他们最近一次自行车碰撞事故以及当时的头盔使用情况。197名自行车骑行者报告在过去五年内发生过碰撞事故,且在事故中头部或头盔受到撞击。碰撞发生时的头盔佩戴情况报告如下:未佩戴头盔(n = 75)、发网式头盔(n = 69)、硬壳且内衬柔软或无内衬(n = 37)、硬壳头盔且内衬坚硬(n = 16)。对未经调整的原始数据进行分析后发现,头盔使用与头部损伤严重程度降低之间存在统计学上的显著关联。在对骑行者的年龄和性别以及碰撞力的严重程度进行调整后,这种关联依然存在。根据Somers开发的一种未发表的方法估计,相对于未佩戴头盔的骑行者,佩戴头盔的骑行者因头部受伤而死亡的风险根据头盔类型的不同有显著降低。