Suppr超能文献

锹甲Cyclommatus mniszechi在雄性间战斗中采用了相互评估和自我评估策略。

Stag beetle Cyclommatus mniszechi employs both mutual- and self-assessment strategies in male-male combat.

作者信息

Chen Zhen-Yi, Lin Chung-Ping, Hsu Yuying

机构信息

Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 88, Section 4, Tingzhou Rd., Taipei 11677, Taiwan.

Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, No. 88, Section 4, Tingzhou Rd., Taipei 11677, Taiwan.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2022 Oct;202:104750. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104750. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

Abstract

Animals may base contest decisions on their fighting ability alone (self-assessment) or also their opponents' (mutual assessment). Many male stag beetles develop disproportionately enlarged mandibles and use them as weapons. Information on their assessment strategy is limited. To investigate their assessment strategy and whether they adopt the same strategy at different stages of contests, we used food to encourage male Cyclommatus mniszechi of different (random pairings) or similar (ML-matched pairings) mandible length (ML) to interact. For the random pairings, losers had shorter mandibles than winners and were faster to feed. Overall contest duration and the tendency to escalate to tussles associated positively with winners' ML and average ML in the random and the ML-matched pairings, respectively, consistent with self-assessment. Non-tussle phase duration associated positively with average ML in the ML-matched pairings, consistent with self-assessment. Tussle phase duration, however, positively associated with losers' ML in the random pairings and had no association with average ML in the ML-matched pairings, consistent with mutual assessment. These results show that (1) the males employ both assessment strategies, (2) winners have more control over contest intensity than losers, and (3) males with shorter mandibles are quicker to feed and also more likely to lose fights.

摘要

动物可能仅依据自身的战斗能力(自我评估)来决定争斗结果,也可能同时考虑对手的能力(相互评估)。许多雄性锹甲发育出不成比例的巨大下颚,并将其用作武器。关于它们评估策略的信息有限。为了研究它们的评估策略以及在争斗的不同阶段是否采用相同的策略,我们用食物促使不同(随机配对)或相似(下颚长度匹配配对)下颚长度(ML)的雄性米氏锯锹甲进行互动。对于随机配对,失败者的下颚比胜利者短,且进食速度更快。总体争斗持续时间以及升级为扭打的倾向,在随机配对中分别与胜利者的ML呈正相关,在ML匹配配对中与平均ML呈正相关,这与自我评估一致。在ML匹配配对中,非扭打阶段的持续时间与平均ML呈正相关,这与自我评估一致。然而,在随机配对中,扭打阶段的持续时间与失败者的ML呈正相关,而在ML匹配配对中与平均ML没有关联,这与相互评估一致。这些结果表明:(1)雄性采用了两种评估策略;(2)胜利者比失败者对争斗强度有更大的控制权;(3)下颚较短的雄性进食更快,也更有可能输掉争斗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验