Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
Heart Vessels. 2023 Feb;38(2):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02163-3. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a reliable lipid marker for atherosclerosis. However, the clinical relevance of Lp(a) to lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) in the same patient has not been investigated. Patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were enrolled. Patients who received hemodialysis, required multidisciplinary treatments, or had incomplete medical history were excluded. A total of 175 patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had LE-PAD (n = 21) or did not (n = 154), and three multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess if Lp(a) level is associated with LE-PAD prevalence. In addition, serum Lp(a) levels were compared among three groups according to the severity of LE-PAD (none, unilateral, or bilateral) and CAD. Serum Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients with LE-PAD than in those without (31.0 mg/dL vs. 13.5 mg/dL, p = 0.002). After adjusting for confounding factors, higher Lp(a) levels were independently associated with the prevalence of LE-PAD in all three models (p < 0.001 for all). With respect to LE-PAD severity, serum Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in the bilateral LE-PAD groups than in the group with no LE-PAD (p = 0.005 for all), whereas Lp(a) was not associated with CAD severity. Though Lp(a) levels are associated with the prevalence and severity of LE-PAD, are not associated with the severity of CAD among patients with ACS.
脂蛋白(a) [Lp(a)] 是动脉粥样硬化的可靠脂质标志物。然而,同一患者的 Lp(a) 与下肢外周动脉疾病 (LE-PAD) 和冠状动脉疾病 (CAD) 的临床相关性尚未得到研究。本研究纳入了因急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS) 而接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者。排除接受血液透析、需要多学科治疗或病史不完整的患者。根据是否存在 LE-PAD(n=21)或不存在 LE-PAD(n=154)将 175 例患者分为两组,并使用三种多变量逻辑回归模型评估 Lp(a) 水平是否与 LE-PAD 患病率相关。此外,还根据 LE-PAD(无、单侧或双侧)和 CAD 的严重程度比较了三组患者的血清 Lp(a) 水平。与无 LE-PAD 患者相比,LE-PAD 患者的血清 Lp(a) 水平显著升高(31.0mg/dL 比 13.5mg/dL,p=0.002)。在调整混杂因素后,较高的 Lp(a) 水平与所有三种模型中 LE-PAD 的患病率独立相关(所有 p<0.001)。就 LE-PAD 严重程度而言,双侧 LE-PAD 组的血清 Lp(a) 水平明显高于无 LE-PAD 组(所有 p=0.005),而 Lp(a) 与 CAD 严重程度无关。尽管 Lp(a) 水平与 LE-PAD 的患病率和严重程度相关,但与 ACS 患者 CAD 严重程度无关。