• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化用于中风患者的贝叶斯分层自适应平台试验设计。

Optimizing a Bayesian hierarchical adaptive platform trial design for stroke patients.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2022 Sep 6;23(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06664-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06664-4
PMID:36068547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9446515/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platform trials are well-known for their ability to investigate multiple arms on heterogeneous patient populations and their flexibility to add/drop treatment arms due to efficacy/lack of efficacy. Because of their complexity, it is important to develop highly optimized, transparent, and rigorous designs that are cost-efficient, offer high statistical power, maximize patient benefit, and are robust to changes over time.

METHODS

To address these needs, we present a Bayesian platform trial design based on a beta-binomial model for binary outcomes that uses three key strategies: (1) hierarchical modeling of subgroups within treatment arms that allows for borrowing of information across subgroups, (2) utilization of response-adaptive randomization (RAR) schemes that seek a tradeoff between statistical power and patient benefit, and (3) adjustment for potential drift over time. Motivated by a proposed clinical trial that aims to find the appropriate treatment for different subgroup populations of ischemic stroke patients, extensive simulation studies were performed to validate the approach, compare different allocation rules, and study the model operating characteristics.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed approach achieved high statistical power and good patient benefit and was also robust against population drift over time. Our design provided a good balance between the strengths of both the traditional RAR scheme and fixed 1:1 allocation and may be a promising choice for dichotomous outcomes trials investigating multiple subgroups.

摘要

背景

平台试验以能够在异质患者人群中研究多个试验组,并能够根据疗效/缺乏疗效灵活添加/删除治疗组而闻名。由于其复杂性,开发高度优化、透明和严格的设计非常重要,这些设计要具有成本效益、提供高统计功效、最大限度地提高患者获益,并能够抵御随时间的变化。

方法

为了满足这些需求,我们提出了一种基于二项式模型的贝叶斯平台试验设计,该设计用于二分类结局,使用了三个关键策略:(1)在治疗组内对亚组进行层次建模,允许跨亚组共享信息;(2)利用响应适应性随机化(RAR)方案,在统计功效和患者获益之间寻求权衡;(3)调整随时间的潜在漂移。受旨在为缺血性脑卒中患者不同亚组人群找到合适治疗方法的拟议临床试验的启发,我们进行了广泛的模拟研究,以验证该方法、比较不同的分配规则,并研究模型的操作特征。

结果和结论

我们提出的方法实现了高统计功效和良好的患者获益,并且对随时间的人群漂移也具有稳健性。我们的设计在传统 RAR 方案和固定 1:1 分配的优势之间取得了良好的平衡,对于研究多个亚组的二分类结局试验可能是一个有前途的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/f6fa273d1cae/13063_2022_6664_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/692ca3f20ddd/13063_2022_6664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/89836b81fed8/13063_2022_6664_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/7f58ee6a4c15/13063_2022_6664_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/e305b285efd1/13063_2022_6664_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/89df04e1f86d/13063_2022_6664_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/ea672a9aac9a/13063_2022_6664_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/2f061e5c3ca2/13063_2022_6664_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/0b81900cd3cb/13063_2022_6664_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/f6fa273d1cae/13063_2022_6664_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/692ca3f20ddd/13063_2022_6664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/89836b81fed8/13063_2022_6664_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/7f58ee6a4c15/13063_2022_6664_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/e305b285efd1/13063_2022_6664_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/89df04e1f86d/13063_2022_6664_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/ea672a9aac9a/13063_2022_6664_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/2f061e5c3ca2/13063_2022_6664_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/0b81900cd3cb/13063_2022_6664_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d92/9446515/f6fa273d1cae/13063_2022_6664_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing a Bayesian hierarchical adaptive platform trial design for stroke patients.优化用于中风患者的贝叶斯分层自适应平台试验设计。
Trials. 2022 Sep 6;23(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06664-4.
2
A Bayesian basket trial design using a calibrated Bayesian hierarchical model.一种使用校准贝叶斯分层模型的贝叶斯篮子试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2018 Apr;15(2):149-158. doi: 10.1177/1740774518755122. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
A Bayesian Hybrid Adaptive Randomisation Design for Clinical Trials with Survival Outcomes.用于生存结局临床试验的贝叶斯混合自适应随机化设计
Methods Inf Med. 2016;55(1):4-13. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0132. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
4
Alternative models and randomization techniques for Bayesian response-adaptive randomization with binary outcomes.用于二分类结局贝叶斯响应自适应随机化的替代模型和随机化技术。
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):417-426. doi: 10.1177/17407745211010139. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
Simulation study for evaluating the performance of response-adaptive randomization.用于评估响应自适应随机化性能的模拟研究
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jan;40:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
6
An efficient Bayesian platform trial design for borrowing adaptively from historical control data in lymphoma.用于淋巴瘤中从历史对照数据自适应借用的高效贝叶斯平台试验设计
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;89:105890. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105890. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
7
ComPAS: A Bayesian drug combination platform trial design with adaptive shrinkage.ComPAS:一种具有自适应收缩的贝叶斯药物联合平台试验设计。
Stat Med. 2019 Mar 30;38(7):1120-1134. doi: 10.1002/sim.8026. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
A Bayesian latent-subgroup platform design for dose optimization.一种用于剂量优化的贝叶斯潜在亚组平台设计。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae093.
10
A multi-source adaptive platform design for testing sequential combinatorial therapeutic strategies.一种用于测试序贯组合治疗策略的多源自适应平台设计。
Biometrics. 2018 Sep;74(3):1082-1094. doi: 10.1111/biom.12841. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive Trials in Stroke: Current Use and Future Directions.卒中适应性试验:当前应用与未来方向
Neurology. 2024 Oct 22;103(8):e209876. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209876. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Conducting a bayesian multi-armed trial with response adaptive randomization for comparative effectiveness of medications for CSPN.进行一项贝叶斯多臂试验,采用响应自适应随机化方法比较用于复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CSPN)的药物的有效性。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Oct 14;36:101220. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101220. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Do we need to adjust for interim analyses in a Bayesian adaptive trial design?在贝叶斯自适应试验设计中,我们是否需要针对中期分析进行调整?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01042-7.
2
The REMAP-CAP (Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for Community-acquired Pneumonia) Study. Rationale and Design.REMAP-CAP(社区获得性肺炎的随机嵌入式多因素适应性平台)研究。原理与设计。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jul;17(7):879-891. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-192SD.
3
Comparison of methods for control allocation in multiple arm studies using response adaptive randomization.
使用反应适应性随机化比较多臂研究中控制分配的方法。
Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;17(1):52-60. doi: 10.1177/1740774519877836. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
4
Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols.系统评价篮子试验、伞式试验和平台试验:主方案的全景分析。
Trials. 2019 Sep 18;20(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3664-1.
5
A Bayesian adaptive marker-stratified design for molecularly targeted agents with customized hierarchical modeling.一种具有定制层次建模的分子靶向药物的贝叶斯自适应标记分层设计。
Stat Med. 2019 Jul 10;38(15):2883-2896. doi: 10.1002/sim.8159. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
6
Master protocol trials in oncology: Review and new trial designs.肿瘤学中的主方案试验:综述与新试验设计
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Aug 24;12:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.009. eCollection 2018 Dec.
7
Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine for Patients With HER2-Mutant Lung Cancers: Results From a Phase II Basket Trial.抗体偶联药物 ado-trastuzumab emtansine 治疗 HER2 突变型肺癌患者的疗效:一项 II 期篮子试验的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20;36(24):2532-2537. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.9777. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
8
Multiplicity Considerations in Clinical Trials.临床试验中的多重性考量
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2115-2122. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1709701.
9
Crizotinib in patients with advanced, inoperable inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours with and without anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene alterations (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 90101 CREATE): a multicentre, single-drug, prospective, non-randomised phase 2 trial.克唑替尼治疗有和无间变性淋巴瘤激酶基因改变的不可切除的晚期炎症性肌纤维母细胞瘤患者(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织 90101 CREATE):一项多中心、单药、前瞻性、非随机 2 期试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Jun;6(6):431-441. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30116-4. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
10
Critical concepts in adaptive clinical trials.适应性临床试验中的关键概念。
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 23;10:343-351. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S156708. eCollection 2018.