Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022 Sep 6;14(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-01068-7.
The COVID-19 pandemic may worsen the mental health of people reporting subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and therefore their clinical prognosis. We aimed to investigate the association between the intensity of SCD and anxious/depressive symptoms during confinement and the underlying mechanisms.
Two hundred fifty cognitively unimpaired participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and SCD-Questionnaire (SCD-Q) and underwent amyloid-β positron emission tomography imaging with [F] flutemetamol (N = 205) on average 2.4 (± 0.8) years before the COVID-19 confinement. During the confinement, participants completed the HADS, Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and an ad hoc questionnaire on worries (access to primary products, self-protection materials, economic situation) and lifestyle changes (sleep duration, sleep quality, eating habits). We investigated stress-related measurements, worries, and lifestyle changes in relation to SCD. We then conducted an analysis of covariance to investigate the association of SCD-Q with HADS scores during the confinement while controlling for pre-confinement anxiety/depression scores and demographics. Furthermore, we introduced amyloid-β positivity, PSS, and BRS in the models and performed mediation analyses to explore the mechanisms explaining the association between SCD and anxiety/depression.
In the whole sample, the average SCD-Q score was 4.1 (± 4.4); 70 (28%) participants were classified as SCD, and 26 (12.7%) were amyloid-β-positive. During the confinement, participants reporting SCD showed higher PSS (p = 0.035) but not BRS scores (p = 0.65) than those that did not report SCD. No differences in worries or lifestyle changes were observed. Higher SCD-Q scores showed an association with greater anxiety/depression scores irrespective of pre-confinement anxiety/depression levels (p = 0.002). This association was not significant after introducing amyloid-β positivity and stress-related variables in the model (p = 0.069). Amyloid-β positivity and PSS were associated with greater HADS irrespective of pre-confinement anxiety/depression scores (p = 0.023; p < 0.001). The association of SCD-Q with HADS was mediated by PSS (p = 0.01).
Higher intensity of SCD, amyloid-β positivity, and stress perception showed independent associations with anxious/depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 confinement irrespective of pre-confinement anxiety/depression levels. The association of SCD intensity with anxiety/depression was mediated by stress perception, suggesting stress regulation as a potential intervention to reduce affective symptomatology in the SCD population in the face of stressors.
COVID-19 大流行可能会恶化报告主观认知下降(SCD)的人的心理健康,从而影响他们的临床预后。我们旨在研究在隔离期间 SCD 的严重程度与焦虑/抑郁症状之间的关联,以及潜在的机制。
250 名认知正常的参与者完成了医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)和 SCD-问卷(SCD-Q),并平均在 COVID-19 隔离前 2.4(±0.8)年接受了[F]氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描成像(N=205)。在隔离期间,参与者完成了 HADS、压力感知量表(PSS)、简要韧性量表(BRS)和一份关于担忧(获得主要产品、自我保护材料、经济状况)和生活方式改变(睡眠时间、睡眠质量、饮食习惯)的特别问卷。我们研究了与 SCD 相关的应激相关测量、担忧和生活方式改变。然后,我们进行了协方差分析,以研究 SCD-Q 与隔离期间 HADS 评分之间的关联,同时控制了隔离前的焦虑/抑郁评分和人口统计学因素。此外,我们在模型中引入了淀粉样蛋白-β阳性、PSS 和 BRS,并进行了中介分析,以探索解释 SCD 与焦虑/抑郁之间关联的机制。
在整个样本中,SCD-Q 平均得分为 4.1(±4.4);70 名(28%)参与者被归类为 SCD,26 名(12.7%)为淀粉样蛋白-β阳性。在隔离期间,报告 SCD 的参与者的 PSS 评分较高(p=0.035),但 BRS 评分无差异(p=0.65)。未观察到担忧或生活方式改变的差异。无论隔离前的焦虑/抑郁水平如何,较高的 SCD-Q 评分与更大的焦虑/抑郁评分均呈相关(p=0.002)。在模型中引入淀粉样蛋白-β阳性和应激相关变量后,该关联不具有统计学意义(p=0.069)。无论隔离前的焦虑/抑郁评分如何,淀粉样蛋白-β阳性和 PSS 与更大的 HADS 评分相关(p=0.023;p<0.001)。SCD-Q 与 HADS 的关联可由 PSS 介导(p=0.01)。
在 COVID-19 隔离期间,较高的 SCD 严重程度、淀粉样蛋白-β阳性和应激感知与焦虑/抑郁症状独立相关,而与隔离前的焦虑/抑郁水平无关。SCD 严重程度与焦虑/抑郁之间的关联可由应激感知介导,这表明应激调节可能是在面对压力源时减轻 SCD 人群情感症状的潜在干预措施。