Lee Kyung Suk, Do Gi Cheol, Shin Jae Bong, Kim Min Hyung, Kim Jun Sik, Kim Nam Gyun
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
Arch Craniofac Surg. 2022 Aug;23(4):171-177. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2022.00164. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
The treatment of zygoma complex fractures is of crucial importance in the field of plastic surgery. However, surgical methods to correct zygoma complex fractures, including the number of fixation sites, differ among operators. Although several studies have compared two-point and three-point fixation, no comparative research has yet been conducted on one-point versus two-point fixation using computed tomography scans of surgical results. Therefore, the present study aimed to address this gap in the literature by comparing surgical results between one-point and two-point fixation procedures.
In this study, we randomly selected patients to undergo surgery using one of two surgical methods. We analyzed patients with unilateral zygoma complex fractures unaccompanied by other fractures according to whether they underwent one-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress or two-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress and the zygomaticofrontal suture. We then made measurements at three points-the zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height-using 3-month postoperative computed tomography images and performed statistical analyses to compare the results of the two methods.
All three measurements (zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height) showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between one-point and two-point fixation. Highly significant differences were found for the zygomaticofrontal suture and malar height parameters. The difference in the inferior wall measurements was less meaningful, even though it also reached statistical significance.
Using three parameters in a statistical analysis of imaging findings, this study demonstrated significant differences in treatment outcomes according to the number of fixations. The results indicate that bone alignment and continuity can be achieved to a greater extent by two-point fixation instead of one-point fixation.
颧骨复合体骨折的治疗在整形外科领域至关重要。然而,矫正颧骨复合体骨折的手术方法,包括固定部位的数量,在不同术者之间存在差异。尽管有几项研究比较了两点固定和三点固定,但尚未使用手术结果的计算机断层扫描对单点固定与两点固定进行比较研究。因此,本研究旨在通过比较单点固定和两点固定手术的结果来填补这一文献空白。
在本研究中,我们随机选择患者采用两种手术方法之一进行手术。我们根据患者是否接受颧上颌支柱单点固定或颧上颌支柱和颧额缝两点固定,分析了单侧颧骨复合体骨折且无其他骨折的患者。然后,我们使用术后3个月的计算机断层扫描图像在三个点——颧额缝、眶下壁和颧骨高度——进行测量,并进行统计分析以比较两种方法的结果。
单点固定和两点固定在所有三项测量(颧额缝、眶下壁和颧骨高度)上均显示出显著差异(p < 0.05)。颧额缝和颧骨高度参数存在高度显著差异。眶下壁测量的差异虽然也达到了统计学意义,但意义较小。
本研究在影像学结果的统计分析中使用三个参数,证明了根据固定数量不同治疗结果存在显著差异。结果表明,两点固定比单点固定能在更大程度上实现骨对齐和连续性。