文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

在欧洲推动医疗器械评估、扩散和使用的边界:COMED 项目的见解。

Pushing the boundaries of evaluation, diffusion, and use of medical devices in Europe: Insights from the COMED project.

机构信息

Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University, Milano, Italy.

Hamburg Centre for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31 Suppl 1:1-9. doi: 10.1002/hec.4600. Epub 2022 Sep 6.


DOI:10.1002/hec.4600
PMID:36068719
Abstract

The field of medical devices has attracted considerable interest from scholarly research in health economics in recent years. Medical devices are indispensable tools for quality health care delivery, but their assessment and appropriate use pose significant challenges to healthcare systems. More research is needed to overcome existing gaps associated with evaluation of digital technologies, address challenges in the use of real-world data in generating evidence for decision-making and to uncover drivers of variation in access to medical devices across countries. Furthermore, the translation of the results and recommendations stemming from research projects into health technology assessment practices needs to be strengthened. The European Union (EU) project COMED aimed to address these gaps by improving existing research and developing new research streams on the methods for evaluation and diffusion of medical devices. The project also intended to provide directly applicable policy advice and tools to inform decision-making, with the aim of impacting public health in the EU. This Health Economics Supplement, together with references of other published outputs of the project, is intended to be the main source for researchers and policy makers seeking information on the COMED project.

摘要

近年来,医疗器械领域引起了健康经济学学术界的极大关注。医疗器械是提供高质量医疗保健的不可或缺的工具,但它们的评估和合理使用给医疗保健系统带来了重大挑战。需要开展更多的研究来克服与数字技术评估相关的现有差距,解决在使用真实世界数据为决策提供证据方面的挑战,并揭示各国医疗器械可及性差异的驱动因素。此外,需要加强将研究项目的结果和建议转化为卫生技术评估实践的工作。欧盟(EU)项目 COMED 的目的是通过改进现有的研究和开发医疗器械评估和传播方法的新研究方向来解决这些差距。该项目还旨在提供直接适用的政策建议和工具,为决策提供信息,以影响欧盟的公共卫生。本健康经济学增刊与该项目的其他已发表成果的参考文献一起,旨在成为寻求有关 COMED 项目信息的研究人员和政策制定者的主要信息来源。

相似文献

[1]
Pushing the boundaries of evaluation, diffusion, and use of medical devices in Europe: Insights from the COMED project.

Health Econ. 2022-9

[2]
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015

[3]
Quo Vadis HTA for Medical Devices in Central and Eastern Europe? Recommendations to Address Methodological Challenges.

Front Public Health. 2020

[4]
Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project.

Health Econ. 2017-2

[5]
Implementation of coverage with evidence development schemes for medical devices: A decision tool for late technology adopter countries.

Health Econ. 2022-9

[6]
PRIORITIES FOR HEALTH ECONOMIC METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH: RESULTS OF AN EXPERT CONSULTATION.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017-10-30

[7]
Development of a framework and decision tool for the evaluation of health technologies based on surrogate endpoint evidence.

Health Econ. 2022-9

[8]
Evaluating health care interventions in the European Union.

Health Policy. 2003-2

[9]
A scoping review of health economic evaluation in the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean region.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021-10

[10]
Coverage with evidence development schemes for medical devices in Europe: characteristics and challenges.

Eur J Health Econ. 2021-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Worldwide trends in the quality and breadth of clinical investigations of medical devices over the past decade: a scoping review and evidence map.

Trials. 2025-3-29

[2]
Domains and Methods of Medical Device Technology Evaluation: A Systematic Review.

Public Health Rev. 2024-7-24

[3]
Coverage with evidence development program on stereotactic body radiotherapy in Belgium (2013-2019): a nationwide registry-based prospective study.

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024-7-6

[4]
Assessing medical devices: a qualitative study from the validate perspective.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024-4-24

[5]
Economic value of diastasis repair with the use of mesh compared to no intervention in Italy.

Eur J Health Econ. 2024-12

[6]
Early technology review: towards an expedited pathway.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024-1-29

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索