• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在重大创伤患者中,与确认毒理学检测相比,尿液药物筛查的假阴性率和类型。

Rates and types of urine drug screen false negative results compared with confirmatory toxicology testing in major trauma patients.

机构信息

Addiction Medicine Research Fellowship Program, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Translational Addiction Medicine Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 Oct;60(10):1122-1129. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2022.2117052. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1080/15563650.2022.2117052
PMID:36069771
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma centers are required to screen patients for alcohol use, and if necessary, intervene and refer to treatment (SBIRT). Similar screening for illicit drug use is recommended but not required. Urine drug screening (UDS) underestimates problematic substance use. This study aimed to estimate the types and rates of UDS false negatives (FN) compared to comprehensive testing by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in trauma patients.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of deidentified urine samples from adult trauma and burn activation patients. Both UDS and LC-MS comprehensive testing of >200 analytes were performed by a reference laboratory on all samples. Iatrogenic medications were excluded from the FN count. Crosstab analyses were conducted for UDS versus LC-MS outcomes to establish FN types and rates. We dichotomized the results by creating an "intentionality" variable (intentional injuries by self/others versus accidental injuries). A series of crosstabs with odds ratios considered intentionality by substance class and demographics. Statistically significant variables by Chi-Square were assessed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Psychoactive FN were detected in 56/100 urine samples analyzed; the most frequent included anticonvulsants (primarily gabapentin,  = 13), opioid agonists ( = 12), antihistamines (primarily diphenhydramine,  = 10), and phenethylamines (primarily bupropion,  = 5). Nonpsychoactive FN were detected in 70/100 samples; the most common were nicotine ( = 33), caffeine ( = 23), acetaminophen ( = 22), and antidepressants ( = 12). Of substance classes included in the UDS and also tested by LC-MS, FN occurred for opiates (3%), amphetamines (5%) and opioids (25%). Polypharmacy was associated with fall injuries in elderly patients. Cocaine ( = 0.015) and cannabinoids ( = 0.002) were significantly associated with intentionality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that FN for potentially important psychoactive and nonpsychoactive substances are common when toxicologic testing is limited to routine UDS in trauma patients. We recommend expanding SBIRT in this patient population to include misuse of tobacco products, prescription analgesics, and over-the-counter antihistamines.

摘要

背景

创伤中心被要求对患者进行酒精使用筛查,如果有必要,进行干预并转介至治疗(SBIRT)。类似的非法药物使用筛查也被推荐,但并非强制性的。尿液药物筛查(UDS)低估了有问题的物质使用。本研究旨在估计在创伤患者中,与液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS)全面检测相比,UDS 假阴性(FN)的类型和比率。

方法

我们对成年创伤和烧伤激活患者的匿名尿液样本进行了前瞻性队列研究。所有样本均由参考实验室进行 UDS 和 LC-MS 综合检测,检测 >200 种分析物。将医源性药物从 FN 计数中排除。对 UDS 与 LC-MS 结果进行交叉表分析,以确定 FN 类型和比率。我们通过创建一个“意图”变量(由自己/他人造成的蓄意伤害与意外伤害)将结果分为二项式。对物质类别和人口统计学因素进行一系列交叉表,以考虑意向性的比值比。通过卡方检验确定有统计学意义的变量,然后通过逻辑回归进行评估。

结果

在分析的 100 个尿液样本中,检测到 56 个具有精神活性的 FN;最常见的包括抗惊厥药(主要是加巴喷丁, = 13)、阿片类激动剂( = 12)、抗组胺药(主要是苯海拉明, = 10)和苯乙胺(主要是安非他酮, = 5)。在 100 个样本中检测到非精神活性 FN;最常见的是尼古丁( = 33)、咖啡因( = 23)、对乙酰氨基酚( = 22)和抗抑郁药( = 12)。在 UDS 中包含并通过 LC-MS 测试的物质类别中,阿片类药物(3%)、苯丙胺(5%)和阿片类药物(25%)的 FN 发生率较高。老年人跌倒损伤与多药合用有关。可卡因( = 0.015)和大麻素( = 0.002)与意图显著相关。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在创伤患者中,毒理学检测仅限于常规 UDS 时,对于潜在重要的精神活性和非精神活性物质的 FN 很常见。我们建议在该患者群体中扩大 SBIRT,以包括烟草制品、处方镇痛药和非处方抗组胺药的滥用。

相似文献

1
Rates and types of urine drug screen false negative results compared with confirmatory toxicology testing in major trauma patients.在重大创伤患者中,与确认毒理学检测相比,尿液药物筛查的假阴性率和类型。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 Oct;60(10):1122-1129. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2022.2117052. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of immunoassay with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) of urine drug testing (UDT) opioids and illicit drugs in chronic pain patients.比较免疫分析法与液相色谱串联质谱法(LC/MS/MS)尿液药物检测(UDT)在慢性疼痛患者中检测阿片类药物和非法药物的准确性。
Pain Physician. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):175-87.
3
Assessment of urine drug screen utility at autopsy to predict laboratory postmortem blood toxicology.尸检时尿液药物筛查对预测实验室死后毒理学的效用评估。
J Forensic Sci. 2024 Sep;69(5):1815-1825. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15561. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
Are point-of-care urine drug testing devices suitable for antenatal drug screening? A study verifying the Alere® Drug Screen Test Cup for the detection of six classes of drug in a pregnant population.床旁尿液毒品检测设备是否适用于产前药物筛查?一项验证 Alere® Drug Screen Test Cup 检测孕妇群体中六类药物的研究。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2021 May;58(3):166-173. doi: 10.1177/0004563221990699. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
High on drugs: Multi-institutional pilot study examining the effects of substance use on acute pain management.药物滥用:多机构试点研究探讨物质使用对急性疼痛管理的影响。
Injury. 2019 May;50(5):1058-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
Urine toxicology screening by liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry in a quaternary hospital setting.在一所四级医院环境中,采用液相色谱飞行时间质谱法进行尿液毒理学筛查。
Clin Biochem. 2021 Sep;95:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 12.
7
Protocol for accuracy of point of care (POC) or in-office urine drug testing (immunoassay) in chronic pain patients: a prospective analysis of immunoassay and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectometry (LC/MS/MS).慢性疼痛患者即时检测(POC)或门诊尿液药物检测(免疫测定)准确性的方案:免疫测定和液相色谱串联质谱法(LC/MS/MS)的前瞻性分析。
Pain Physician. 2010 Jan-Feb;13(1):E1-E22.
8
Lower Cutoffs for LC-MS/MS Urine Drug Testing Indicates Better Patient Compliance.尿液药物检测 LC-MS/MS 下限降低表明患者的依从性更好。
Pain Physician. 2017 Nov;20(7):E1107-E1113.
9
Oral Fluid and Drug Impairment: Pairing Toxicology with Drug Recognition Expert Observations.口腔液与药物致损:毒物学与药物识别专家观察结果的配对。
J Anal Toxicol. 2019 Sep 10;43(8):637-643. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkz075.
10
Hair drug testing results and self-reported drug use among primary care patients with moderate-risk illicit drug use.初级护理中存在中度风险非法药物使用的患者的毛发药物检测结果及自我报告的药物使用情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Aug 1;141:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Drugs in Whole Blood by Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry with Integrated Solid-Phase Extraction.采用集成固相萃取的纸喷雾质谱法分析全血中的药物
Anal Chem. 2025 Jul 8;97(26):14004-14012. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5c02394. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
High-Throughput Comprehensive Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Common Drugs and Metabolites (62 Compounds) in Human Urine.高通量综合定量 LC-MS/MS 分析人尿液中的常见药物和代谢物(62 种化合物)。
Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2737:215-227. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3541-4_20.
3
Comparing presumptive with direct-to-definitive drug testing in oral fluid vs. urine for a U.S. national sample of individuals misusing drugs.
将疑似药物滥用者的口腔液与尿液进行直接确证药物检测的比较:来自美国全国药物滥用者样本的研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Sep 1;250:110894. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110894. Epub 2023 Jul 15.