Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对透析患者心血管结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers on cardiovascular outcomes in dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, 1st Department of Medicine, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

2nd Department of Gastroenterology, Iatriko Athinon, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Jan 23;38(1):203-211. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac253.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are recommended by guidelines as first-line antihypertensive therapies in the general population or in patients with earlier stages of kidney disease. However, the cardioprotective benefit of these agents among patients on dialysis remains uncertain.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases from inception through February 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of ACEIs/ARBs relative to placebo or no add-on treatment in patients receiving dialysis. RCTs were eligible if they assessed fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events as a primary efficacy endpoint.

RESULTS

We identified five RCTs involving 1582 dialysis patients. Compared with placebo or no add-on treatment, the use of ACEIs/ARBs was not associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events {risk ratio [RR] 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.11]}. Furthermore, there was no benefit in cardiovascular mortality [RR 0.82 (95% CI 0.59-1.14)] and all-cause mortality [RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.64-1.15)]. These results were consistent when the included RCTs were stratified by subgroups, including hypertension, ethnicity, sample size, duration of follow-up and quality.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis showed that among patients on dialysis, the use of ACEIs/ARBs is not associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality as compared with placebo or no add-on treatment.

摘要

背景

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和/或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)被指南推荐为一般人群或早期肾病患者的一线降压治疗药物。然而,这些药物在透析患者中的心脏保护益处仍不确定。

方法

我们从 2022 年 2 月之前的 MEDLINE、PubMed 和 Cochrane 数据库中搜索了比较 ACEI/ARB 相对于安慰剂或无附加治疗在接受透析的患者中的疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。如果 RCT 评估了致命或非致命心血管事件作为主要疗效终点,则符合入选标准。

结果

我们确定了 5 项涉及 1582 名透析患者的 RCT。与安慰剂或无附加治疗相比,ACEI/ARB 的使用与心血管事件的风险降低无关{风险比(RR)0.79 [95%置信区间(CI)0.57-1.11]}。此外,心血管死亡率[RR 0.82(95%CI 0.59-1.14)]和全因死亡率[RR 0.86(95%CI 0.64-1.15)]均无获益。当根据亚组、包括高血压、种族、样本量、随访时间和质量对纳入的 RCT 进行分层时,这些结果仍然一致。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,与安慰剂或无附加治疗相比,在透析患者中,ACEI/ARB 的使用与心血管事件和全因死亡率的风险降低无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验