Cappelari Bruno Egídio, Godinho Fernanda Marques de Souza, da Silva Amanda Gonzalez, Belaguarda Adriana Almeida, Balz Kenya, da Rosa Julio Cesar Almeida, Ferreira José Carlos, Bertagnolli Angélica Cavalheiro, Roehe Paulo Michel, Batista Helena Beatriz de Carvalho Ruthner, Franco Ana Cláudia, Mayer Fabiana Quoos, Campos Aline Alves Scarpellini, Dantas Giovana
Centro de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária, Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul, Eldorado do Sul, Brazil.
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo, Brazil.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Nov;69(6):3449-3456. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14701. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
Rabies is an encephalitis caused by rabies virus, whose transmission occurs upon contact with infected animals' saliva. The diagnosis is usually performed post-mortem through a direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT). If the DFAT results are negative, they must be confirmed with an isolation test, usually the mouse inoculation test (MIT), which implies the suffering and death of the animals, high costs and most importantly, up to 28 days to confirm a negative result. Another issue related to rabies diagnosis is the sample collection and storage, which is critical for the rabies virus' RNA genome. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate (i) reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Rabies Tissue Culture Infection Tests (RTCIT) in comparison to DFAT and MIT and (ii) FTA cards as an alternative sample collection and preservation method. Eighty animal samples were evaluated through DFAT, RTCIT and RT-PCR; MIT was performed only in DFAT-negative samples. FTA cards were evaluated with a subset of 64 samples, with sufficient material for imprinting. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), agreement and Cohen's kappa were calculated for each test combination. RTCIT had higher sensitivity (92.5%) and RT-PCR had higher specificity (92.3%) compared to DFAT. The combination of tests enhanced sensitivity, NPV and Cohen's kappa (considering positive results by RTCIT or RT-PCR), and specificity and PPV (when both tests were concordant). The PCR based on FTA cards as sample source was specific (84.6%-96.2%) but presented lower sensitivity (29.7%-73.0%), although it could detect as positive four DFAT-negative samples. RTCIT and RT-PCR may be used as confirmatory tests in DFAT-negative samples. Moreover, FTA cards may be helpful for sample collection in field situations where a long time is needed until the sample undergoes laboratory testing.
狂犬病是一种由狂犬病毒引起的脑炎,其传播是通过接触受感染动物的唾液而发生的。诊断通常在死后通过直接荧光抗体试验(DFAT)进行。如果DFAT结果为阴性,则必须通过隔离试验进行确认,通常是小鼠接种试验(MIT),这意味着动物会遭受痛苦并死亡,成本高昂,而且最重要的是,确认阴性结果需要长达28天的时间。与狂犬病诊断相关的另一个问题是样本采集和保存,这对于狂犬病毒的RNA基因组至关重要。因此,本研究旨在评估:(i)与DFAT和MIT相比,逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)和狂犬病组织培养感染试验(RTCIT);以及(ii)FTA卡作为一种替代的样本采集和保存方法。通过DFAT、RTCIT和RT-PCR对80份动物样本进行了评估;MIT仅在DFAT阴性样本中进行。用64份有足够材料用于印迹的样本子集对FTA卡进行了评估。计算了每种试验组合的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)、一致性和科恩kappa系数。与DFAT相比,RTCIT具有更高的敏感性(92.5%),RT-PCR具有更高的特异性(92.3%)。试验组合提高了敏感性、NPV和科恩kappa系数(考虑RTCIT或RT-PCR的阳性结果),以及特异性和PPV(当两种试验结果一致时)。基于FTA卡作为样本来源的PCR具有特异性(84.6%-96.2%),但敏感性较低(29.7%-73.0%),尽管它可以将4份DFAT阴性样本检测为阳性。RTCIT和RT-PCR可作为DFAT阴性样本的确认试验。此外,在需要很长时间样本才进行实验室检测的现场情况下,FTA卡可能有助于样本采集。