Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530000, Guangxi, China.
Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, No. 35 Jiefang Road, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China.
Pediatr Res. 2023 May;93(6):1491-1498. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02294-3. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adults. Little attention is given to pediatric VTE (PVTE). The objective of this study is to study the efficacy and safety of DOACs in published PVTE randomized control trials (RCTs). PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Cochrane Library, SinoMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until 2021, to identify RCTs that enrolled patients with VTE <18 years of age who received DOACs versus standard anticoagulation. Outcomes were evaluated using the Mantel-Haenszel method of random-effects model. Our study evaluated seven RCTs that included 1139 cases of PVTE, which had a low risk of publication and assessment bias. Compared with standard anticoagulation, patients receiving DOACs presented a lower rate of recurrent VTE (relative risk [RR], 0.42 [confidence interval {CI}, 0.20 to 0.89]), similar mortality rate (RR, 0.50 [CI, 0.07 to 3.57]), major bleeding (RR, 0.46 [CI, 0.14 to 1.57]), and higher clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (RR, 2.71 [CI, 1.05 to 7.02]) with low heterogeneity. Limiting to subgroups, dabigatran and rivaroxaban yielded similar findings, except for a higher incidence of nonmajor bleeding during rivaroxaban use. DOACs could be an alternative to standard anticoagulation in PVTE. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have similar effects. IMPACT: In venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used as a substitution for standard anticoagulation in most situations for adults; however, little attention is paid to the pediatric population. For pediatric VTE, previous meta-analyses have emphasized the epidemiology, risk factors, and the use of traditional anticoagulants, and seldom reported the use of novel oral anticoagulants. This is the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that focuses on the efficacy outcomes and safety endpoints of DOACs compared with standard anticoagulation in pediatric VTE.
直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)广泛用于治疗成人静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)。对于儿科 VTE(PVTE),关注较少。本研究旨在研究已发表的 PVTE 随机对照试验(RCT)中 DOAC 的疗效和安全性。检索了 PubMed、Embase、中国知网、Cochrane 图书馆、SinoMed 和 ClinicalTrials.gov,以确定纳入 VTE<18 岁接受 DOAC 与标准抗凝治疗的患者的 RCT。使用随机效应模型的 Mantel-Haenszel 方法评估结局。我们的研究评估了 7 项 RCT,包括 1139 例 PVTE,这些 RCT 具有低发表和评估偏倚风险。与标准抗凝相比,接受 DOAC 治疗的患者 VTE 复发率较低(相对风险 [RR],0.42 [置信区间 {CI},0.20 至 0.89]),死亡率相似(RR,0.50 [CI],0.07 至 3.57]),大出血(RR,0.46 [CI],0.14 至 1.57]),但临床相关非大出血发生率较高(RR,2.71 [CI],1.05 至 7.02]),异质性较低。限制在亚组中,达比加群和利伐沙班的结果相似,但利伐沙班的非大出血发生率较高。DOAC 可作为 PVTE 标准抗凝的替代方案。达比加群和利伐沙班的作用相似。影响:在静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)中,在大多数情况下,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)作为成人标准抗凝的替代物广泛使用;然而,儿科人群的关注度较低。对于儿科 VTE,之前的荟萃分析强调了流行病学、危险因素和传统抗凝剂的使用,很少报道新型口服抗凝剂的使用。这是第一项专注于儿科 VTE 中 DOAC 与标准抗凝相比的疗效结局和安全性终点的随机对照试验荟萃分析。