Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver School of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Haematology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 May;18(5):1100-1112. doi: 10.1111/jth.14739. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
Clinically unsuspected venous thromboembolic events (uVTE) detected during routine imaging pose a management challenge due to limited knowledge about their clinical significance. Unsuspected VTE are often referred as "asymptomatic," "incidental," or "clinically silent/occult" VTE.
To understand the epidemiology, management, and outcomes of uVTE in children.
A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The search criteria included controlled vocabulary and keywords for VTE, incidental findings, and children (ages ≤ 21 years).
Among 10 875 articles, 51 studies (8354 children with 758 uVTE) were selected. The studies were heterogeneous, I 96%; P < .0001. Unsuspected VTE were diagnosed in two settings: first, asymptomatic VTE (aVTE) diagnosed through surveillance imaging for VTE (46 studies; n = 5894; aVTE: 715, pooled frequency: 19%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 13%-24%); second, incidental VTE (iVTE) diagnosed during imaging performed for indications without primary suspicion for VTE (6 studies; n = 2460; iVTE: 43). The majority (94%) of aVTE were associated with central venous lines (CVL). Non-CVL settings included post-spinal surgery, post-splenectomy, trauma, nephrotic syndrome, and newborns. In general, aVTE were reported to have a benign clinical course, were mostly transient, and resolved without intervention and with few immediate or long-term functional complications. Incidental VTE were primarily detected in children with cancer and ranged from tumor-associated thrombi to pulmonary embolism (PE) with insufficient evidence to draw meaningful conclusions about their management.
Clinically uVTE were predominantly diagnosed with CVL and their outcomes were generally favorable implying limited benefit of routine surveillance and thromboprophylaxis. Prospective research is needed to clarify the optimal management of iVTE.
在常规影像学检查中发现的临床未疑诊的静脉血栓栓塞事件(uVTE)由于对其临床意义了解有限,因此存在管理挑战。未疑诊的 VTE 通常被称为“无症状”、“偶然”或“临床隐匿/隐匿性”VTE。
了解儿童 uVTE 的流行病学、管理和结局。
根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行系统评价。检索标准包括 VTE、偶然发现和儿童(≤21 岁)的受控词汇和关键词。
在 10875 篇文章中,选择了 51 项研究(8354 例儿童中有 758 例 uVTE)。这些研究存在异质性,I²=96%;P<0.0001。未疑诊的 VTE 有两种诊断情况:首先,无症状 VTE(aVTE)通过 VTE 的监测影像学诊断(46 项研究;n=5894;aVTE:715,汇总频率:19%,95%置信区间[CI]:13%-24%);其次,偶然 VTE(iVTE)在因非 VTE 主要怀疑的影像学检查中诊断(6 项研究;n=2460;iVTE:43)。大多数(94%)aVTE 与中央静脉导管(CVL)有关。非-CVL 情况下包括脊柱手术后、脾切除术后、创伤、肾病综合征和新生儿。一般来说,aVTE 报告的临床病程是良性的,大多是短暂的,无需干预即可缓解,且无即时或长期功能并发症。偶然 VTE 主要在患有癌症的儿童中发现,从肿瘤相关血栓到肺动脉栓塞(PE)不等,但没有足够的证据来得出关于其管理的有意义的结论。
临床上 uVTE 主要与 CVL 相关诊断,其结局通常良好,这意味着常规监测和血栓预防的获益有限。需要前瞻性研究来阐明 iVTE 的最佳管理。