Consorci d'Atenció Primària de Salut de L'Eixample (CAPSBE), Barcelona, Spain.
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 7;22(1):1133. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08496-z.
Applicability of comprehensive assessment of integrated care services in real world settings is an unmet need. To this end, a Triple Aim evaluation of Hospital at Home (HaH), as use case, was done. As ancillary aim, we explored use of the approach for monitoring the impact of adoption of integrated care at health system level in Catalonia (Spain).
Prospective cohort study over one year period, 2017-2018, comparing hospital avoidance (HaH-HA) with conventional hospitalization (UC) using propensity score matching. Participants were after the first episode directly admitted to HaH-HA or the corresponding control group. Triple Aim assessment using multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was done. Moreover, applicability of a Triple Aim approach at health system level was explored using registry data.
HaH-HA depicted lower: i) Emergency Room Department (ER) visits (p < .001), ii) Unplanned re-admissions (p = .012); and iii) costs (p < .001) than UC. The weighted aggregation of the standardized values of each of the eight outcomes, weighted by the opinions of the stakeholder groups considered in the MCDA: i) enjoyment of life; ii) resilience; iii) physical functioning; iv) continuity of care; v) psychological wellbeing; (vi) social relationships & participation; (vii) person-centeredness; and (viii) costs, indicated better performance of HaH-HA than UC (p < .05). Actionable factors for Triple Aim assessment of the health system with a population-health approach were identified.
We confirmed health value generation of HaH-HA. The study identified actionable factors to enhance applicability of Triple Aim assessment at health system level for monitoring the impact of adoption of integrated care.
ClinicalTrials.gov (26/04/2017; NCT03130283).
综合关怀服务的全面评估在实际环境中的适用性是一个未满足的需求。为此,我们以医院居家(HaH)为案例进行了三目标评估。作为辅助目标,我们探索了该方法在加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)卫生系统层面上监测综合关怀采用的影响。
2017 年至 2018 年进行了为期一年的前瞻性队列研究,通过倾向评分匹配比较了 HaH-HA 与常规住院治疗(UC)的医院回避情况。参与者在首次发病后直接被收入 HaH-HA 或相应的对照组。采用多准则决策分析(MCDA)进行三目标评估。此外,还利用登记数据探索了三目标方法在卫生系统层面的适用性。
HaH-HA 组的急诊室就诊次数(p < 0.001)、非计划性再入院率(p = 0.012)和成本(p < 0.001)均低于 UC 组。MCDA 考虑的利益相关者组对八项结果中的每一项的标准化值进行加权聚合:i)生活享受度;ii)适应力;iii)身体机能;iv)护理连续性;v)心理健康;vi)社会关系和参与度;vii)以患者为中心;viii)成本,表明 HaH-HA 的表现优于 UC(p < 0.05)。确定了基于人群健康的方法对卫生系统进行三目标评估的可行因素。
我们证实了 HaH-HA 的健康价值创造。该研究确定了可行因素,以增强基于三目标评估在卫生系统层面监测综合关怀采用的影响的适用性。
ClinicalTrials.gov(2017 年 4 月 26 日;NCT03130283)。