Richter Melanie, Wühr Peter
TU Dortmund, Dortmund, DE.
J Cogn. 2022 Feb 1;5(1):15. doi: 10.5334/joc.206. eCollection 2022.
In two-choice response tasks, participants respond faster and more accurate with the left hand to a small stimulus and with the right hand to a large stimulus as compared to the reverse assignment. This compatibility effect suggests the existence of associations between cognitive codes of physical stimulus size and cognitive codes of left/right responses. Here, we explore the nature of associations between stimulus-size codes and left/right response codes by using more levels of stimulus size than in our previous studies. For example, the strengths of the associations between stimulus-size codes and response codes might either change gradually when stimulus size changes, or the strength of associations might change in a more discrete fashion (i.e., associations switch at a particular size level). In Experiment 1, participants responded to stimulus color with a left/right keypress, and physical stimulus size had ten levels with 5 mm steps. Results showed correspondence effects for the smallest and the largest stimulus size only. In Experiment 2, physical stimulus size had six levels with 10 mm steps. Results showed (similar) correspondence effects for the smallest and some intermediate stimulus-size levels. In sum, the results point towards a discrete, or categorical, relationship between cognitive codes of stimulus size and left/right response codes. This pattern of results is consistent with an account of the correspondence effect in terms of the polarity correspondence principle.
在二选一反应任务中,与相反的分配方式相比,参与者用左手对小刺激做出反应更快且更准确,用右手对大刺激做出反应更快且更准确。这种兼容性效应表明物理刺激大小的认知代码与左/右反应的认知代码之间存在关联。在此,我们通过使用比之前研究更多的刺激大小水平来探究刺激大小代码与左/右反应代码之间关联的本质。例如,当刺激大小改变时,刺激大小代码与反应代码之间关联的强度可能会逐渐变化,或者关联强度可能以更离散的方式变化(即,关联在特定大小水平处切换)。在实验1中,参与者通过按左/右按键对刺激颜色做出反应,物理刺激大小有十个水平,步长为5毫米。结果仅在最小和最大刺激大小水平上显示出对应效应。在实验2中,物理刺激大小有六个水平,步长为10毫米。结果在最小和一些中间刺激大小水平上显示出(类似的)对应效应。总之,结果表明刺激大小的认知代码与左/右反应代码之间存在离散的或分类的关系。这种结果模式与基于极性对应原则对对应效应的解释是一致的。