• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速在线民族志的可能性与局限:从针对吸毒者的新冠疫情政策快速评估中获得的经验教训

Possibilities and constraints of rapid online ethnography: Lessons from a rapid assessment of COVID-19 policy for people who use drugs.

作者信息

Eaves Emery R, Trotter Robert T, Marquez Bonnie, Negron Kayla, Doerry Eck, Mensah David, Compton-Gore Kate A, Lanzetta Shana A, Kruithoff Kathryn, Dykman Kaitlyn, Baldwin Julie A

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.

Center for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2022 Aug 22;7:959642. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.959642. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2022.959642
PMID:36072500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9441939/
Abstract

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, health care provision changed rapidly and funding became available to assess pandemic-related policy change. Research activities, however, were limited to contactless, online delivery. It was clear early on that some elements of online rapid ethnography were feasible and effective, while others would not approach traditional ethnographic depth. We conducted an online Rapid Assessment, Response, and Evaluation (RARE) project from August 2020 to September 2021 to understand how COVID-19 policy impacted people who use drugs. Our interdisciplinary research team conducted online ethnographic interviews and focus groups with 45 providers and community stakeholders, and 19 clients from rural and urban areas throughout Arizona. In addition, 26 webinars, online trainings, and virtual conferences focused on opioid policy and medication for opioid use disorders (MOUD) were opportunities to observe conversations among providers and program representatives about how best to implement policy changes, how to reach people in recovery, and what aspects of the changes should carry forward into better all-around opioid services in the future. Our RARE project was successful in collecting a range of providers' perspectives on both rural and urban implementation of take-home MOUDs as well as a wide view of national conversations, but client perspectives were limited to those who were not impacted by the policies and continued to attend in-person daily clinic visits. We describe challenges to online rapid ethnography and how online research may have allowed for an in-depth, but incomplete picture of how policy changes during COVID-19 policy affected people with opioid use disorders.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,医疗保健服务迅速改变,并且有资金可用于评估与疫情相关的政策变化。然而,研究活动仅限于非接触式的在线开展。早期就很明显,在线快速人种志的某些要素是可行且有效的,而其他要素则无法达到传统人种志的深度。我们在2020年8月至2021年9月期间开展了一个在线快速评估、响应和评价(RARE)项目,以了解新冠疫情政策如何影响吸毒者。我们的跨学科研究团队对45名提供者和社区利益相关者以及来自亚利桑那州农村和城市地区的19名客户进行了在线人种志访谈和焦点小组讨论。此外,26次关于阿片类药物政策和阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗(MOUD)的网络研讨会、在线培训和虚拟会议,为观察提供者和项目代表之间关于如何最好地实施政策变化、如何接触康复者以及这些变化的哪些方面应在未来转化为更好的全方位阿片类药物服务的对话提供了机会。我们的RARE项目成功收集了一系列提供者对农村和城市地区居家MOUD实施情况的看法以及对全国性对话的广泛观点,但客户的观点仅限于那些未受政策影响且继续亲自参加每日门诊就诊的人。我们描述了在线快速人种志面临的挑战,以及在线研究如何可能提供了一个关于新冠疫情期间政策变化如何影响阿片类药物使用障碍患者的深入但不完整的情况。

相似文献

1
Possibilities and constraints of rapid online ethnography: Lessons from a rapid assessment of COVID-19 policy for people who use drugs.快速在线民族志的可能性与局限:从针对吸毒者的新冠疫情政策快速评估中获得的经验教训
Front Sociol. 2022 Aug 22;7:959642. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.959642. eCollection 2022.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Child and Adolescent Mental Health Policy and Practice Implementation.COVID-19 大流行对儿童和青少年心理健康政策和实践实施的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 13;18(18):9622. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189622.
3
Nothing really changed: Arizona patient experience of methadone and buprenorphine access during COVID.实际上并没有什么变化:亚利桑那州患者在 COVID 期间接受美沙酮和丁丙诺啡的体验。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 25;17(10):e0274094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274094. eCollection 2022.
4
Massachusetts Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (MassJCOIN).马萨诸塞州司法社区阿片类药物创新网络(MassJCOIN)。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Sep;128:108275. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108275. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
From policy to practice: Pilot program increases access to medication for opioid use disorder in rural Colorado.从政策到实践:试点项目增加了科罗拉多州农村地区阿片类药物使用障碍患者的药物可及性。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Jul;114:108027. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108027. Epub 2020 May 7.
7
An examination of telehealth policy impacts on initial rural opioid use disorder treatment patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic.考察新冠疫情期间远程医疗政策对农村地区初始阿片类药物使用障碍治疗模式的影响。
J Rural Health. 2021 Jun;37(3):467-472. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12570. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
What a Pandemic Has Taught Us About the Potential for Innovation in Rural Health: Commencing an Ethnography in Canada, the United States, Sweden, and Australia.大流行带给我们的关于农村卫生创新潜力的启示:在加拿大、美国、瑞典和澳大利亚开展民族志研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;9:768624. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.768624. eCollection 2021.
9
The Role of Information Infrastructures in Scaling up Video Consultations During COVID-19: Mixed Methods Case Study Into Opportunity, Disruption, and Exposure.信息基础设施在 COVID-19 期间扩大视频咨询中的作用:混合方法案例研究机遇、干扰和暴露。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 10;24(11):e42431. doi: 10.2196/42431.
10
"Sick and tired of being sick and tired": Exploring initiation of medications for opioid use disorder among people experiencing homelessness.“厌倦了生病和疲惫”:探索在无家可归者中开始使用治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jul;138:108752. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108752. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches to enabling rapid evaluation of innovations in health and social care: a scoping review of evidence from high-income countries.促进卫生和社会保健创新快速评估的方法:高收入国家证据的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;12(12):e064345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064345.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 among people who use drugs: A qualitative study with harm reduction workers and people who use drugs.COVID-19 对吸毒人群的影响:一项与减少伤害工作者和吸毒人群的定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Jul 2;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00653-1.
2
Coronavirus Disease 2019 and the Impact on Substance Use Disorder Treatments.新型冠状病毒肺炎 2019 年与物质使用障碍治疗的影响。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2022 Mar;45(1):95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
3
The digital divide impacts on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的数字鸿沟对心理健康的影响。
Brain Behav Immun. 2022 Mar;101:211-213. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
4
Another silver lining?: Anthropological perspectives on the promise and practice of relaxed restrictions for telemedicine and medication-assisted treatment in the context of COVID-19.另一个亮点?:关于在新冠疫情背景下放宽远程医疗和药物辅助治疗限制的前景与实践的人类学视角
Hum Organ. 2020 Winter;79(4):292-303. doi: 10.17730/1938-3525-79.4.292. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
5
Telemedicine for treating mental health and substance use disorders: reflections since the pandemic.用于治疗心理健康和物质使用障碍的远程医疗:疫情以来的思考
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 May;46(6):1068-1070. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-00960-4. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Revisiting the Digital Divide in the COVID-19 Era.重新审视新冠疫情时代的数字鸿沟
Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2021 Mar;43(1):458-464. doi: 10.1002/aepp.13104. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
Determinants of broadband access and affordability: An analysis of a community survey on the digital divide.宽带接入与可承受性的决定因素:一项关于数字鸿沟的社区调查分析
Cities. 2020 Nov;106:102904. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102904. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
8
Substance Use Disorders and COVID-19: Multi-Faceted Problems Which Require Multi-Pronged Solutions.物质使用障碍与2019冠状病毒病:需要多管齐下解决方案的多方面问题。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 21;11:714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00714. eCollection 2020.
9
An Investigation of Early Syphilis Among Men Who have Sex with Men: Alaska, 2018: Findings from a 2018 Rapid Ethnographic Assessment.男男性行为人群中早期梅毒感染的调查:阿拉斯加,2018 年:2018 年快速人种学评估的结果。
J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00834-8.
10
Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代数字鸿沟的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1147-1148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa078.