Department of Pulmonology, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Aug 31;17:2013-2025. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S362906. eCollection 2022.
We explored the differences in clinical manifestations of COPD patients regarding emphysema distribution along with evidence of airway involvement in chest computed tomography (CT) scans.
The patients were divided into three groups according to the emphysema distribution: the upper dominant (UD), lower dominant (LD), and homogeneous (HD) groups. Airway wall thickness was quantitatively measured and the presence of bronchiectasis and/or bronchial wall thickening (BE/BWT) was visually assessed. Baseline characteristics including the evidence of airway involvement and long-term outcomes were compared among the three groups. Non-severe patients of each group were first treated with 3 months of ICS/LABA combination after 2 weeks of wash-out period and lung functions before and after the treatment were compared.
Of the 425 patients, 141 were in the UD, 107 in LD, and 177 in HD. The LD had more severe airway obstruction with lower emphysema index (EI) than the UD (LD vs UD; FEV, 49.5-14.9 vs 54.6-16.5; EI, 21.0 [IQR: 14.0-33.1] vs 26.3 [IQR: 15.8-39.0]). The LD showed thicker airways (higher WA% and Pi10) and more severe air trapping (higher RV and RV/TLC) than UD. A larger proportion of patients in LD had BE/BWT (35.5% in LD vs 11.3% in UD). In LD, more patients experienced acute exacerbations and the time to first exacerbation was shorter than UD. Non-severe patients in LD treated with 3 months of ICS/LABA combined inhalers showed a notable reduction of RV than UD (LD vs UD; -531.1-936.5 vs -86.5-623.5).
The LD showed a more prominent airway involvement than UD, which may cause more frequent exacerbations and a marked reduction of RV after the ICS/LABA combination treatment in LD. Phenotyping of the COPD patients using quantitatively measured emphysema distribution would be useful for predicting treatment response and exacerbation.
我们探讨了在胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)中肺气肿分布以及气道受累证据方面,COPD 患者临床表现的差异。
根据肺气肿分布将患者分为三组:上肺优势型(UD)、下肺优势型(LD)和全肺分布型(HD)。定量测量气道壁厚度,并观察支气管扩张和/或支气管壁增厚(BE/BWT)的存在。比较三组之间的基线特征,包括气道受累的证据和长期结局。在洗脱期 2 周后,每组非重度患者先接受 3 个月 ICS/LABA 联合治疗,比较治疗前后的肺功能。
425 例患者中,141 例为 UD,107 例为 LD,177 例为 HD。与 UD 相比,LD 气道阻塞更严重,肺气肿指数(EI)更低(LD 比 UD:FEV1,49.5-14.9 比 54.6-16.5;EI,21.0 [IQR:14.0-33.1] 比 26.3 [IQR:15.8-39.0])。LD 气道更厚(WA%和 Pi10 更高),空气潴留更严重(RV 和 RV/TLC 更高)。LD 中出现 BE/BWT 的患者比例较大(35.5%在 LD 比 11.3%在 UD)。在 LD 中,更多患者经历急性加重,首次加重时间更短。LD 中用 3 个月 ICS/LABA 联合吸入剂治疗的非重度患者 RV 明显减少(LD 比 UD:-531.1-936.5 比-86.5-623.5)。
LD 气道受累比 UD 更明显,这可能导致 LD 患者在 ICS/LABA 联合治疗后更频繁的急性加重和 RV 明显减少。通过定量测量肺气肿分布对 COPD 患者进行表型分析有助于预测治疗反应和急性加重。