• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下取石术治疗无症状胆总管结石与有症状胆总管结石的疗效和安全性比较。

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Removal for Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones in Comparison with Symptomatic Stones.

机构信息

Division of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan.

出版信息

Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2022 Sep 20;47(3):143-148.

PMID:36073287
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic removal is recommended for common bile duct stones (CBDs). However, in patients with asymptomatic CBDs, follow-up without treatment may be recommended because of the increased complication risks associated with asymptomatic CBDs removal. The objective of our study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of CBDs removal in asymptomatic patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with naive papilla who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the treatment of CBDs from April 2016 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the efficacy and safety of CBDs removal in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

RESULTS

We enrolled 300 patients, 53 asymptomatic and 247 symptomatic patients. Endoscopic CBDs removal was successful in all patients, except one symptomatic patient. However, the complete stone removal rate in a single session was significantly higher in the asymptomatic group than that in the symptomatic group. ERCP-related complications did not differ between the asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was similar and liver cirrhosis was the only significant risk factor for pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION

Complication risks associated with endoscopic CBDs removal was not significantly different between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Liver cirrhosis was a significant risk factor of ERCP-related pancreatitis.

摘要

目的

推荐采用内镜方法去除胆总管结石(CBDs)。然而,对于无症状 CBDs 患者,由于与无症状 CBDs 取石相关的并发症风险增加,可能会建议不进行治疗而进行随访。本研究旨在探讨无症状患者 CBDs 取石的疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析 2016 年 4 月至 2020 年 8 月因 CBDs 行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗的初治乳头患者的连续病例。我们比较了无症状和有症状患者 CBDs 取石的疗效和安全性。

结果

共纳入 300 例患者,53 例无症状,247 例有症状。除 1 例有症状患者外,所有患者均成功进行了内镜 CBDs 取石,但无症状组单次取石的完全清除率明显高于有症状组。无症状和有症状患者的 ERCP 相关并发症无差异。胰腺炎的发生率相似,肝硬化是胰腺炎的唯一显著危险因素。

结论

无症状和有症状患者内镜 CBDs 取石的并发症风险无显著差异。肝硬化是 ERCP 相关胰腺炎的显著危险因素。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Removal for Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones in Comparison with Symptomatic Stones.内镜下取石术治疗无症状胆总管结石与有症状胆总管结石的疗效和安全性比较。
Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2022 Sep 20;47(3):143-148.
2
Balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for asymptomatic common bile duct stones on surgically altered anatomy: A high risk factor for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.经皮球囊小肠镜辅助下内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗外科术后解剖结构改变所致无症状胆总管结石:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的高危因素。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2024 Jan;31(1):25-33. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1365. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
3
Remaining issues of recommended management in current guidelines for asymptomatic common bile duct stones.现行无症状胆总管结石治疗指南中推荐的管理方案仍存在的问题。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 14;27(18):2131-2140. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i18.2131.
4
Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis after Conservative Treatment for Symptomatic Bile Duct Stones.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎经保守治疗后用于有症状胆管结石的情况。
JMA J. 2023 Apr 14;6(2):156-164. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2022-0165. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
5
Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones Are Associated with Increased Risk of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.无症状胆总管结石与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎风险增加相关。
JMA J. 2021 Apr 15;4(2):141-147. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2020-0123. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
6
Comparison of Outcomes and Complications of Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Removal Between Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Patients.无症状和有症状患者内镜下胆总管结石取出术的结局与并发症比较
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Apr;61(4):1172-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3965-5. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
7
[Do we overtreat patients? Heavily increased risk for ERCP pancreatitis after treatment for asymptomatic common bile duct stones].我们是否过度治疗了患者?无症状胆总管结石治疗后内镜逆行胰胆管造影术胰腺炎风险大幅增加
Lakartidningen. 2019 Aug 23;116:FRY7.
8
Comparable safety of ERCP in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with common bile duct stones: a propensity-matched analysis.有症状和无症状胆总管结石患者行 ERCP 的安全性相当:倾向评分匹配分析。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan;56(1):111-117. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1853222. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Increased risk and severity of ERCP-related complications associated with asymptomatic common bile duct stones.与无症状胆总管结石相关的内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相关并发症的风险和严重程度增加。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Sep;5(9):E809-E817. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-107615. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
The high rate of spontaneous migration of small size common bile duct stones may allow a significant reduction in unnecessary ERCP and related complications: results of a retrospective, multicenter study.小尺寸胆总管结石的高自发迁移率可能会显著减少不必要的内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)及相关并发症:一项回顾性多中心研究的结果
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3542-3548. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08676-8. Epub 2021 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Symptomatic Status on Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Complications in Choledocholithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.症状状态对胆总管结石内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后并发症的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Apr 29;16(4):e59322. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59322. eCollection 2024 Apr.