Greater Palatine Canal: Computed Tomography-Based Anatomic Analysis And Clinical Significance for the Sinus and Skull Base Surgeon.

ObjectiveOur aim is to describe the location and course of the greater palatine canal (GPC) by analyzing its relationship with anatomical landmarks that can be used during endoscopic sinus surgery. This information might help prevent injury to the neurovascular bundle.MethodsA retrospective evaluation of paranasal sinus CT scans of 100 consecutive random patients, 200 sides, was performed. Five measurements related to the course of the GPC were conducted, from cranial to caudal. The anatomical landmarks were the inferior bony border of the sphenopalatine foramen to the cranial entrance of the GPC, the distance from the most dorsal, and inferior bony insertion of the middle turbinate and the inferior turbinate bones to the anterior margin of the GPC. The angle between the horizontal palatine bone and the GPC, its length, and the prevalence of osteophytes in GPC was also assessed.ResultsThe mean distance of the inferior border of the sphenopalatine foramen to the cranial entrance of the GPC was 9.39 ± 1.72 mm. The mean distance of the dorsal insertion of the middle turbinate to the anterior margin of the GPC was 3.89 ± 0.93 mm. The distance of the dorsal insertion of the inferior turbinate to the anterior margin of the GPC was 3.16 ± 0.81 mm. The mean angle between the horizontal palatine bone and the GPC was 114.33 ± 10.92º and the mean length of the GPC was 30.23 ± 3.74 mm. None of the measurements showed a significant difference between the two sides.ConclusionsThe landmarks used are easy to locate and assess on CT scans. These findings may help to make dissection safer in pathologies related to the pterygopalatine fossa, lateral sphenoid sinus or adjacent skull base.