School of Criminology and Justice Studies, 14710University of Massachusetts Lowell, MA, USA.
DSM Consulting, Northamton, MA, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP14970-NP14995. doi: 10.1177/08862605221106188.
Recent years have seen growing public interest in how college and university administrators respond to sexual misconduct. Despite policy changes in this area, minimal research exists on how institutions of higher education (IHEs) are sharing and processing information about students found responsible for sexual misconduct. Aiming to establish some of the key questions and parameters in this line of research, this practitioner-researcher collaboration offers a first look at how IHEs share information about students who have been found responsible both within their campus and between campuses, as well as how IHEs respond when that information is shared (e.g., admitting a student applicant who has been previously sanctioned for a sexual misconduct violation). Practitioners designed and disseminated a questionnaire to campus administrators, including Title IX coordinators and student conduct administrators, via higher education association listservs. Exploratory results from 176 participants showed that 80% reported having some form of policy regarding sharing information within their institution, while approximately half have policies regarding sharing information to other IHEs regarding students found responsible of sexual misconduct. Nearly one-third of participants reported that their IHEs are engaging in campus information sharing through the use of transcript notation. In terms of IHEs receiving information about student applicants having been previously sanctioned for a sexual misconduct violation, approximately one-fourth of participants indicated their IHE has chosen not to accept a student for this reason within the past 5 years, and a quarter of IHEs have accepted such students. For those IHEs that have accepted a student previously found responsible, the majority of IHEs are not following the outcomes of these students, indicating an unknown in terms of whether information sharing policies were effective. As a result, preliminary findings suggest that more evaluation research is needed before any further policies are mandated.
近年来,公众对高校管理人员如何应对不当性行为的兴趣日益浓厚。尽管该领域的政策发生了变化,但几乎没有研究探讨高等教育机构(IHEs)如何共享和处理有关被认定为不当性行为的学生的信息。本实践研究合作旨在确定这一研究领域的一些关键问题和参数,首次考察了 IHEs 如何在校园内和校园之间共享有关被认定为有责任的学生的信息,以及当共享信息时 IHEs 如何做出反应(例如,接受因性不当行为违规而受到先前制裁的学生申请人)。实践者通过高等教育协会列表服务向校园管理员(包括 TitleIX 协调员和学生行为管理员)设计并分发了一份问卷。来自 176 名参与者的探索性结果表明,80%的人报告说他们所在机构有某种形式的关于共享信息的政策,而大约一半的人有关于向其他 IHEs 共享关于被认定为性不当行为的学生的信息的政策。近三分之一的参与者报告说,他们的 IHEs 通过使用成绩单注释来进行校园信息共享。就 IHEs 收到有关学生申请人因性不当行为违规而受到先前制裁的信息而言,大约四分之一的参与者表示,他们的 IHE 在过去 5 年内出于这个原因选择不接受学生,而四分之一的 IHEs 已经接受了这些学生。对于那些已经接受过以前被认定为有责任的学生的 IHEs,大多数 IHEs 没有跟踪这些学生的结果,这表明在信息共享政策是否有效的方面存在未知。因此,初步研究结果表明,在制定任何进一步的政策之前,需要进行更多的评估研究。