• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助胸腔镜肺切除术中成本-容量关系的存在

The Presence of a Cost-Volume Relationship in Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Resections.

作者信息

Verma Arjun, Hadaya Joseph, Richardson Shannon, Vadlakonda Amulya, Ramezani Ramin, Revels Sha'Shonda, Benharash Peyman

机构信息

Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), Division of Cardiac Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):e377-e381. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005699. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005699
PMID:36073775
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the relationship between institutional robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy volume and hospitalization costs.

BACKGROUND

The high cost of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) is among several drivers of hesitation among nonadopters. Studies examining the impact of institutional experience on costs of RATS lobectomy are lacking.

METHODS

Adults undergoing RATS lobectomy for primary lung cancers were identified from the 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. A multivariable regression to model hospitalization costs was developed with the inclusion of hospital RATS lobectomy volume as restricted cubic splines. The volume corresponding to the inflection point of the spline was used to categorize hospitals as high- (HVH) or low-volume (LVH). We subsequently examined the association of HVH status with adverse events, length of stay, costs, and 30-day, nonelective readmissions.

RESULTS

An estimated 14,756 patients underwent RATS lobectomy during the study period, with median cost of $23,000. Upon adjustment for patient and operative characteristics, hospital RATS volume was inversely associated with costs. Although only 17.2% of centers were defined as HVH, 51.7% of patients were managed at these centers. Patients at HVH and LVH had similar age, sex, and distribution of comorbidities. Notably, patients at HVH had decreased risk-adjusted odds of adverse events (adjusted odds ratio: 0.62, P <0.001), as well as significantly reduced length of stay (-0.8 d, P <0.001) and costs (-$3900, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing hospital RATS lobectomy volume was associated with reduced hospitalization costs. Our findings suggest the presence of streamlined care pathways at high-volume centers, which influence costs of care.

摘要

目的

描述机构机器人辅助肺叶切除术的例数与住院费用之间的关系。

背景

机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)的高成本是未采用该技术的医疗机构犹豫不决的几个原因之一。缺乏关于机构经验对RATS肺叶切除术成本影响的研究。

方法

从2016年至2018年全国再入院数据库中识别出接受RATS肺叶切除术治疗原发性肺癌的成年人。开发了一个多变量回归模型来模拟住院费用,其中将医院RATS肺叶切除术例数作为受限立方样条纳入。样条拐点对应的例数用于将医院分为高例数(HVH)或低例数(LVH)。随后,我们研究了HVH状态与不良事件、住院时间、费用以及30天非选择性再入院之间的关联。

结果

在研究期间,估计有14,756例患者接受了RATS肺叶切除术,中位费用为23,000美元。在对患者和手术特征进行调整后,医院RATS例数与费用呈负相关。虽然只有17.2%的中心被定义为HVH,但这些中心管理了51.7%的患者。HVH和LVH的患者在年龄、性别和合并症分布方面相似。值得注意的是,HVH的患者发生不良事件的风险调整后几率降低(调整优势比:0.62,P<0.001),住院时间也显著缩短(-0.8天,P<0.001),费用降低(-3900美元,P<0.001)。

结论

医院RATS肺叶切除术例数的增加与住院费用的降低相关。我们的研究结果表明,高例数中心存在简化的护理路径,这会影响护理成本。

相似文献

1
The Presence of a Cost-Volume Relationship in Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Resections.机器人辅助胸腔镜肺切除术中成本-容量关系的存在
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):e377-e381. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005699. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Video-Assisted vs Robotic-Assisted Lung Lobectomies for Operating Room Resource Utilization and Patient Outcomes.电视辅助与机器人辅助肺叶切除术对手术室资源利用及患者预后的影响
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e248881. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8881.
3
Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (Premier).比较机器人辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与传统电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术和楔形切除术:来自多医院数据库的结果(Premier)。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Mar;147(3):929-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
4
Utilization Trends, Outcomes, and Cost in Minimally Invasive Lobectomy.微创肺叶切除术的利用趋势、结果和成本。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec;108(6):1648-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.049. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
5
Successful Transition to Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy With Previous Proficiency in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.先前熟练掌握胸腔镜肺叶切除术后成功过渡到机器人辅助肺叶切除术。
Innovations (Phila). 2019 Jun;14(3):263-271. doi: 10.1177/1556984519845672. Epub 2019 May 3.
6
Hospital cost and clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: A propensity score-weighted comparison.机器人辅助与电视辅助和开胸肺叶切除术的医院成本和临床效果:倾向评分加权比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):2018-2026.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.101. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
7
Robotic-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Outcomes From High-Volume Thoracic Surgeons.机器人辅助与胸腔镜肺叶切除术:高容量胸外科医生的结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Sep;106(3):902-908. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.048. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
8
Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic Approaches for Clinical Stage I and Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.利用胸外科医师协会数据库比较电视辅助胸腔镜手术和机器人手术治疗临床Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期非小细胞肺癌的效果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Sep;102(3):917-924. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 May 19.
9
Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Lobectomies.机器人辅助肺叶切除术的医院容量和结果。
Chest. 2017 Feb;151(2):329-339. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Compare with Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Lung Lobectomy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)与电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)用于非小细胞肺癌患者肺叶切除的疗效及安全性比较
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2019;22(3):169-178. doi: 10.2174/1386207322666190411113040.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlations of kinematic data with robotic experience and duration of practice on complications and readmissions.运动学数据与机器人使用经验以及并发症和再入院的练习时长之间的相关性。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 18;19(1):403. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02557-1.
2
Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下腹疝修补术的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02997-4.
3
Association of center-level operative volume and acute outcomes following robotic-assisted colectomy for colorectal cancer.
机器人辅助结肠癌切除术的中心手术量与急性预后的相关性
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0299174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299174. eCollection 2025.
4
The Surgical Renaissance: Advancements in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes.外科复兴:电视辅助胸腔镜手术和机器人辅助胸外科手术的进展及其对患者预后的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 5;16(17):3086. doi: 10.3390/cancers16173086.