Shah Muhammad Ibrahim, Shuaibu Muhammad Shehu, AbdulKareem Hauwah K K, Khan Zulfiqar, Abbas Shujaat
Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology (REES), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Department of Economics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):10329-10345. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22788-1. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
Despite making significant progress in reducing poverty over the last several decades, the world has witnessed persistent surge in global inequality. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between natural resource, environmental vulnerability, monetary-fiscal stability, and inequality in a global perspective during 2005 to 2019 for 61 countries. We distinguish between consumption and income inequality to see whether the variables under study have different implications for different measurement of inequality. The study employs Driscoll-Kraay standard error method which can account for the cross-sectional dependence between the countries. The study divides 61 countries according to the World Bank income classifications to provide evidence of heterogeneity in the sample economies. The main finding highlights that natural resources induce both consumption and income inequality whereas greenhouse gas emissions have been found to reduce the inequality of both types. Quality of government and access to electricity decrease consumption and income inequality while technological innovation and monetary-fiscal stability have incremental impacts on inequality. The coefficient of natural disaster has been shown to be positive for consumption inequality but negative and insignificant for income inequality. When analyzing moderating impacts, we find that quality of government cannot moderate the positive impact of natural resources on consumption inequality, but it can exacerbate the resources' impact on income inequality. The result for sub-sample group also differs for consumption and income inequality. The study recommends management of natural resources in a sustainable way with the help of good governance.
尽管在过去几十年里全球在减贫方面取得了重大进展,但全球不平等现象仍持续加剧。本研究旨在从全球视角考察2005年至2019年期间61个国家自然资源、环境脆弱性、货币财政稳定性与不平等之间的关系。我们区分了消费不平等和收入不平等,以观察所研究的变量对不同不平等衡量指标是否有不同影响。本研究采用了德里斯柯尔-克雷标准误差方法,该方法可以考虑各国之间的横截面依赖性。本研究根据世界银行的收入分类对61个国家进行划分,以提供样本经济体异质性的证据。主要研究结果表明,自然资源会导致消费不平等和收入不平等,而温室气体排放则被发现会减少这两种不平等。政府治理质量和电力供应可降低消费不平等和收入不平等,而技术创新和货币财政稳定性对不平等有递增影响。自然灾害系数对消费不平等呈正向影响,但对收入不平等呈负向且不显著影响。在分析调节作用时,我们发现政府治理质量无法缓和自然资源对消费不平等的正向影响,但会加剧自然资源对收入不平等的影响。子样本组在消费不平等和收入不平等方面的结果也有所不同。本研究建议在良好治理的帮助下以可持续方式管理自然资源。