Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Sep 5;75Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e20210757. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0757. eCollection 2022.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the educational intervention through an informative manual in reducing anxiety, stress, and changes in vital signs in patients awaiting cardiac catheterization.
Parallel, randomized, controlled, blind clinical trial. The study excluded patients waiting for cardiac catheterization; those who received the information manual were randomized to the intervention group, and those who received routine information from the unit went to the control group. The study used the State Anxiety Inventory and Perceived Stress Scale and the ANOVA test to analyze the outcomes between the groups. Clinical Trials NCT03369873.
There was no change concerning time, first and second moment (anxiety, P=0.225; and stress, P=0.696), interaction (anxiety, P=0.183; and stress, P=0.444), or groups, control, and intervention (anxiety, P=0.341; and stress, p=0.624).
Although the educational intervention performed did not have an impact on the reduction of anxiety and stress, this type of intervention should be maintained for greater comfort and safety of patients and family members.
评估通过信息手册进行教育干预对减轻焦虑、压力和等待心导管插入术患者生命体征变化的效果。
平行、随机、对照、盲法临床试验。该研究排除了等待心导管插入术的患者;接受信息手册的患者被随机分为干预组,而从科室接受常规信息的患者则进入对照组。该研究使用状态焦虑量表和感知压力量表和方差分析来分析组间结果。临床试验 NCT03369873。
在时间、第一时刻和第二时刻(焦虑,P=0.225;压力,P=0.696)、相互作用(焦虑,P=0.183;压力,P=0.444)或组(对照组和干预组)方面,均未发生变化(焦虑,P=0.341;压力,p=0.624)。
尽管进行的教育干预没有减轻焦虑和压力,但这种干预类型应该保持,以提高患者和家属的舒适度和安全性。