Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego.
Roski Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 1;140(10):1002-1005. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3450.
Ganglion cell analysis (GCA) of ocular coherence tomography (OCT) imaging is routinely used to detect and monitor glaucomatous damage of the ganglion cell complex in the macula. The GCA printout provides qualitative and quantitative data about the macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer and a single B-scan of the retina through the fovea. However, the full macular cube scan, including all 128 B-scans, is available for review. The macular cube scan provides considerable information about nonglaucomatous ocular pathology that may be missed if clinicians review only the GCA printout.
To determine the frequency and type of nonglaucomatous macular findings that are observable in the full macular cube scan but not the GCA printout.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of GCA printouts and full macular cube scans to detect nonglaucomatous macular pathology at a tertiary care academic center. Consecutive patients undergoing ganglion cell complex imaging during routine glaucoma evaluations over a 1-week period in a multi-clinician glaucoma clinic.
The prevalence and type of nonglaucomatous macular pathology visible on the GCA printout or macular cube scan.
Among 105 patients (mean (SD) age, 67 (15.46) years; 63 [60%] female and 42 [40%] male) 201 eyes were imaged (64 [31.7%] with suspected glaucoma, 126 [62.4%] with open-angle glaucoma, 6 [3.0%] with closed-angle glaucoma, and 6 [3.0%] with other glaucoma). GCA printouts and macular cube scans revealed nonglaucomatous macular pathology in 65 eyes (32.2%). Of these, 25 eyes (38.5%) included findings that were not visible on the GCA printout. Of the cases not visible on the printout, 16 eyes (64.0% ) included macular pathology that required further evaluation.
The findings indicate that nonglaucomatous macular pathology may be missed based on GCA printouts alone. While it may be beneficial to review the full macular cube to detect potentially vision-threatening disease and ensure proper patient care, this study cannot determine if this missed pathology affects clinical outcomes.
眼相干断层扫描(OCT)成像的神经节细胞分析(GCA)通常用于检测和监测黄斑神经节细胞复合体的青光眼损伤。GCA 打印输出提供了关于黄斑神经节细胞-内丛状层的定性和定量数据,以及通过黄斑的单个视网膜 B 扫描。然而,全黄斑立方体扫描(包括所有 128 个 B 扫描)可用于复查。全黄斑立方体扫描提供了大量关于非青光眼眼部病变的信息,如果临床医生仅查看 GCA 打印输出,可能会错过这些信息。
确定在全黄斑立方体扫描中可见但在 GCA 打印输出中不可见的非青光眼性黄斑病变的频率和类型。
设计、设置和参与者:在一个三级学术中心,对 GCA 打印输出和全黄斑立方体扫描进行回顾性横断面分析,以检测常规青光眼评估期间在多临床医生青光眼诊所进行的神经节细胞复合体成像的连续患者。
在 GCA 打印输出或黄斑立方体扫描上可见的非青光眼性黄斑病变的患病率和类型。
在 105 名患者(平均(SD)年龄,67(15.46)岁;63[60%]名女性和 42[40%]名男性)的 201 只眼中进行了成像(64[31.7%]只眼怀疑青光眼,126[62.4%]只眼开角型青光眼,6[3.0%]只眼闭角型青光眼,6[3.0%]只眼其他青光眼)。GCA 打印输出和黄斑立方体扫描显示 65 只眼(32.2%)存在非青光眼性黄斑病变。其中,25 只眼(38.5%)的眼底病变在 GCA 打印输出上不可见。在打印输出上不可见的病例中,16 只眼(64.0%)的眼底病变需要进一步评估。
研究结果表明,仅基于 GCA 打印输出可能会遗漏非青光眼性黄斑病变。虽然查看全黄斑立方体以检测潜在威胁视力的疾病并确保适当的患者护理可能是有益的,但本研究无法确定这种遗漏的病理是否会影响临床结果。