• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激知觉细节对情感和语义效价表征的发散效应。

A divergent effect of stimulus perceptual details on affective and semantic representations of valence.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Haifa.

出版信息

Emotion. 2023 Aug;23(5):1236-1253. doi: 10.1037/emo0001148. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1037/emo0001148
PMID:36074618
Abstract

The current work investigated the potential dissociation between two modes of valence: affective valence (valence of the emotional response) and semantic valence (stored knowledge about the valence of an object/event). A series of six experiments systematically examined the divergent effect of manipulating the amount of perceptual details on affective valence and semantic knowledge about valence. We predicted that affective valence, more than semantic valence, will be affected by manipulating the amount of stimulus perceptual details. Experiment 1a manipulated the amount of perceptual details by presenting the same stimulus content with different quantity of perceptual details. We compared three conditions: a very short movie clip, a still picture that was taken from the movie clip, and a blurred version of the picture from the movie clip. Experiment 1b replicated Experiment 1a using a stronger filter for blurring the picture. Experiment 2 used different manipulation of filtering out visual perceptual details by comparing still pictures to outlined images. Experiment 3 generalized the results of Experiments 1 and 2 by comparing pictures and written words. Experiments 4a and 4b examined the hypothesis regarding the divergent effect of the amount of perceptual details on semantic and affective valence, using physiological signals and a reaction time task, measures that do not rely on self-reports. Results suggest that affective valence is more sensitive to the change in the amount of perceptual details of the stimulus than semantic valence. The psychological mechanism that might underlie this effect and the theoretical implications of the findings are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

当前的工作研究了两种价值模式之间的潜在分离

情感价值(情感反应的价值)和语义价值(关于对象/事件价值的存储知识)。一系列六个实验系统地检查了操纵感知细节数量对情感价值和语义价值知识的发散效应。我们预测,情感价值比语义价值更受操纵刺激感知细节数量的影响。实验 1a 通过呈现具有不同数量的感知细节的相同刺激内容来操纵感知细节的数量。我们比较了三种条件:非常短的电影片段、取自电影片段的静态图片和电影片段中图片的模糊版本。实验 1b 使用更强大的模糊图片滤波器复制了实验 1a。实验 2 通过比较静态图片和轮廓图像来操纵过滤视觉感知细节的不同方式。实验 3 通过比较图片和文字,将实验 1 和 2 的结果推广。实验 4a 和 4b 使用生理信号和反应时间任务检验了关于感知细节数量对语义和情感价值的发散效应的假设,这些测量方法不依赖于自我报告。结果表明,情感价值比语义价值对刺激感知细节数量的变化更为敏感。讨论了可能导致这种效应的心理机制以及研究结果的理论意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
A divergent effect of stimulus perceptual details on affective and semantic representations of valence.刺激知觉细节对情感和语义效价表征的发散效应。
Emotion. 2023 Aug;23(5):1236-1253. doi: 10.1037/emo0001148. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Dissociating affective and semantic valence.区分情感效价和语义效价。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jul;146(7):924-942. doi: 10.1037/xge0000291. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
3
Semantic and affective representations of valence: Prediction of autonomic and facial responses from feelings-focused and knowledge-focused self-reports.效价的语义和情感表示:从关注感觉和关注知识的自我报告预测自主和面部反应。
Emotion. 2020 Apr;20(3):486-500. doi: 10.1037/emo0000567. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
4
Semantic and affective manifestations of ambi (valence).双关(多义)的语义和情感表现。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Nov;33(7):1356-1369. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1564249. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
5
On the latency of object recognition and affect: Evidence from speeded reaction time tasks.关于物体识别与情感的潜伏期:来自快速反应时间任务的证据。
Emotion. 2023 Mar;23(2):486-503. doi: 10.1037/emo0001092. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
6
Temporal dynamics of the semantic versus affective representations of valence during reversal learning.反转学习过程中效价的语义与情感表征的时间动态。
Cognition. 2023 Jul;236:105423. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105423. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
7
The spread of affective and semantic valence representations across states.情感和语义效价表示在状态间的传播。
Cognition. 2024 Mar;244:105714. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105714. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
8
Crossmodal negativity bias in semantic processing.跨模态负性偏向在语义处理中的作用。
Emotion. 2022 Sep;22(6):1270-1280. doi: 10.1037/emo0000918. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
9
Auditory affective processing requires awareness.听觉情感处理需要意识。
Emotion. 2019 Feb;19(1):53-69. doi: 10.1037/emo0000388. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
10
An event-related potential investigation of the relationship between semantic and perceptual levels of representation.一项关于表征的语义和知觉水平之间关系的事件相关电位研究。
Brain Lang. 2003 Aug;86(2):300-25. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00546-1.