• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受全膝关节置换术决策过程中的性别差异。

Gender differences in the decision-making process for undergoing total knee replacement.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Grup de Recerca Multidisciplinar en Salut i Societat (GREMSAS), (2017 SGR 917), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Dec;105(12):3459-3465. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.014. Epub 2022 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.014
PMID:36075809
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess gender differences in the decision-making process for treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A secondary analysis of a randomized trial was conducted (n = 193). Knowledge of OA and total knee replacement (TKR), decisional conflict, satisfaction with the decision-making process, treatment preference and TKR uptake 6 months later were compared by gender. Multivariate regression models were developed to identify gender-specific predictors.

RESULTS

Women showed less knowledge (MD = -7.68, 95% CI: -13.9, -1.46, p = 0.016), reported less satisfaction (MD = -6.95, 95% CI: -11.7, -2.23, p = 0.004) and gave more importance to avoiding surgery (U = 2.09, p = 0.019). In women, more importance attributed to the time needed to relieve symptoms significantly reduced the odds of surgery (OR = 0.76, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The provision of information and/or promotion of shared decision-making could be of lower quality in female patients, although other explanations such as differences in information needs or preference for involvement in decision-making cannot be ruled out with the current evidence. Given the study's limitations, especially regarding the sample size, further confirmation is needed.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A systematic, shared decision-making approach in consultation is needed to avoid potential gender-based biases.

摘要

目的

评估膝关节骨关节炎(OA)治疗决策过程中的性别差异。

方法

对一项随机试验进行了二次分析(n=193)。按性别比较了对 OA 和全膝关节置换术(TKR)的了解程度、决策冲突、对决策过程的满意度、治疗偏好以及 6 个月后的 TKR 接受率。采用多元回归模型确定性别特异性预测因素。

结果

女性的知识水平较低(MD=-7.68,95%CI:-13.9,-1.46,p=0.016),报告的满意度较低(MD=-6.95,95%CI:-11.7,-2.23,p=0.004),更重视避免手术(U=2.09,p=0.019)。在女性中,对缓解症状所需时间的重视程度显著降低了手术的可能性(OR=0.76,p=0.016)。

结论

尽管目前的证据不能排除信息需求或参与决策偏好的差异等其他解释,但女性患者获得的信息和/或促进共同决策的质量可能较低。鉴于该研究的局限性,特别是样本量的限制,还需要进一步证实。

实践意义

需要在咨询中采用系统的、共同决策的方法,以避免潜在的基于性别的偏见。

相似文献

1
Gender differences in the decision-making process for undergoing total knee replacement.接受全膝关节置换术决策过程中的性别差异。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Dec;105(12):3459-3465. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.014. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
2
Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Patient Decision Aid vs Educational Material on Decision Quality, Shared Decision-Making, Patient Experience, and Functional Outcomes in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.人工智能辅助患者决策辅助工具与教育材料对膝骨关节炎成人患者决策质量、共同决策、患者体验及功能结局影响的比较:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037107. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37107.
3
Protocol for systematic review: patient decision aids for total hip and knee arthroplasty decision-making.系统评价方案:全髋关节和膝关节置换术决策用患者决策辅助工具
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;10(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01549-6.
4
An individualized decision aid for physicians and patients for total knee replacement in osteoarthritis (Value-based TKR study): study protocol for a multi-center, stepped wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial.面向骨关节炎全膝关节置换术的医生和患者的个体化决策辅助工具(基于价值的 TKR 研究):一项多中心、阶梯式、群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 12;22(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04546-5.
5
Current Status and Future Prospects for Shared Decision Making Before and After Total Knee Replacement Surgery-A Scoping Review.全膝关节置换术前和术后共享决策的现状和未来展望——范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 14;18(2):668. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020668.
6
Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study).随机对照试验方案,评估促进髋和膝关节骨关节炎共同决策策略的比较效果(DECIDE-OA 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 24;9(2):e024906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024906.
7
Reducing gender disparities in post-total knee arthroplasty expectations through a decision aid.通过决策辅助工具减少全膝关节置换术后期望方面的性别差异。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 7;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0473-x.
8
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into shared decision-making in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol.将患者报告的结局纳入膝关节骨关节炎患者管理中的共同决策:一项混合有效性-实施研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e055933. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055933.
9
Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.决策辅助工具对膝骨关节炎患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021 Sep;29(9):1265-1274. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
10
Factors related to the indecision of older adults with knee osteoarthritis about receiving physician-recommended total knee arthroplasty.与患有膝关节骨关节炎的老年人在接受医生推荐的全膝关节置换术时犹豫不决相关的因素。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Nov;39(22):2302-2307. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1226407. Epub 2016 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Decisional Regret After Shared Decision Making for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术患者共同决策后与决策后悔相关的因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 3;13(13):1597. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131597.
2
Biopsychosocial Determinants for Total Knee Replacement Decisions Among Older Adults With Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review.慢性膝关节骨关节炎老年患者全膝关节置换决策的生物心理社会决定因素:一项范围综述
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Apr 23;16:21514593251335882. doi: 10.1177/21514593251335882. eCollection 2025.
3
Patient decision aids for hip and knee arthroplasty decision-making: a scoping review protocol.
用于髋关节和膝关节置换术决策的患者决策辅助工具:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 3;15(4):e089305. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089305.
4
Decision experiences in joint replacement surgery for patients with haemophilic arthritis: A qualitative study.血友病性关节炎患者关节置换手术中的决策体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02901-3.
5
Sex differences in the radiographic and symptomatic prevalence of knee and hip osteoarthritis.膝关节和髋关节骨关节炎的影像学和症状患病率的性别差异。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 4;15:1445468. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1445468. eCollection 2024.
6
Challenges in Orthopedic Surgical Decision-Making for Multilevel Vertebrae Fractures.多节段椎体骨折的骨科手术决策挑战
Cureus. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):e68262. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68262. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Public Preferences for Surgeon Gender in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.沙特阿拉伯公众对外科医生性别的偏好:一项横断面分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 12;12(12):1185. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121185.
8
Gender health gap pre- and post-joint arthroplasty: identifying affected patient-reported health domains.关节置换术前和术后的性别健康差距:确定受影响的患者报告的健康领域。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Feb 27;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02131-5.
9
Sex-Based Differences in the Utilization of Shoulder, Hip, and Knee Arthroplasty.性别差异对肩关节、髋关节和膝关节置换术的利用影响。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Aug 7;7(8). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00022. eCollection 2023 Aug 1.