Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, University of Macau, Macau.
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Efficacy Study on Chinese Materia Medica, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, 5 c0 b00, China.
Food Res Int. 2022 Oct;160:111628. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111628. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
The species of Camellia nitidissima Chi (CC) and C. euphlebia Merr. ex Sealy (CE) are two most important plant sources for commercialized herbal tea (Jinhuacha) worldwide. However, some other species of camellia genus are also sold as alternatives in market due to the great commercial value. In this study, the similarity and difference of CC and CE as well as C.insularis (CI) are comprehensively compared both in chemistry and pharmacology. Based on the ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with a hybrid quadrupole orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometer(UPLC-QTOF-MS) analysis, a sequential-optimization based new statistical model has been developed by combining the untargeted metabolomics and fingerprint analyses, and successfully applied for chemical pattern recognition and discrimination of three yellow camellias species. The results indicated that CC, CE and CI could be well discriminated with the optimized chemical combination including quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (C2), okicamelliaside (C4), Kaempferol 7-O-rhamnoside (C6), Corymboside (C9), asiatic acid-glc-rha-xyl (C11) and 3'-methy-4'-glucoside-ellagic acid (C14). Moreover, the 30 % ethanolic extracts of yellow camellias species presented the optimal activities on anti-inflammation/anti-oxidation in LPS-stimulated Raw264.7 macrophages dose-dependently. The averaged 50 % inhibitory concentrations (IC50) on NO production were 754.68 ± 50.96, 1182.39 ± 22.10, 1527.83 ± 106.24 μg(herb)/mL, and ROS production were 311.70 ± 26.57, 332.64 ± 25.46, 917.60 ± 41.36 μg(herb)/mL for CC, CE and CI, respectively. The results indicated a certain similarity of CC and CE, as well as their significant difference from CI.
金花茶(CC)和大苞山茶(CE)是世界上商业化茶饮(金花茶)最重要的两种植物来源。然而,由于巨大的商业价值,一些其他的茶花属植物也被作为替代品在市场上销售。在这项研究中,我们综合比较了 CC 和 CE 以及中越金花茶(CI)在化学和药理学上的异同。基于超高效液相色谱与混合四极杆正交飞行时间质谱联用(UPLC-QTOF-MS)分析,我们建立了一种基于序贯优化的新统计模型,结合无靶向代谢组学和指纹图谱分析,成功应用于三种黄色茶花物种的化学模式识别和区分。结果表明,CC、CE 和 CI 可以通过包括槲皮素-3-O-鼠李糖苷(C2)、奥卡米卡林(C4)、山奈酚 7-O-鼠李糖苷(C6)、连翘苷(C9)、熊果酸-glc-rha-xyl(C11)和 3'-甲基-4'-葡萄糖基鞣花酸(C14)在内的优化化学组合得到很好的区分。此外,黄色茶花物种的 30%乙醇提取物在 LPS 刺激的 Raw264.7 巨噬细胞中呈现出剂量依赖性的抗炎/抗氧化最佳活性。NO 产生的平均 50%抑制浓度(IC50)分别为 754.68±50.96、1182.39±22.10、1527.83±106.24μg(药草)/mL,ROS 产生分别为 311.70±26.57、332.64±25.46、917.60±41.36μg(药草)/mL。结果表明,CC 和 CE 具有一定的相似性,而它们与 CI 有显著的差异。