Zheng Qiuqin, Wen Xiaoting, Xiu Xintian, Yang Xiaoke, Chen Qiuhua
College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
College of Resource and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Foods. 2022 Aug 24;11(17):2564. doi: 10.3390/foods11172564.
Chemical pesticides are a serious impediment to agricultural sustainability. A large-scale reduction in their use to secure food supplies requires more innovative and flexible production systems. Pesticide-free production standards bring together the strengths of all participants in the food value chain and could be the catalyst for this transition. Using a choice experiment approach and green tea as an example, this study investigated consumers' preferences for organic and pesticide-free labels. According to the findings, organic and pesticide-free labels and brands are all major factors that affect consumers' purchase decisions. Consumers are more willing to pay for organic labels than pesticide-free labels. There is a substitution effect between organic labels and pesticide-free labels. Complementary effects exist between organic labels and national brands, pesticide-free labels, and national brands. Consumer trust has an impact on consumers' choice of organic labels and pesticide-free labels. The use of pesticide-free labels is an alternate approach for small- and medium-sized businesses in a specific market to lower the cost of organic certification.
化学农药是农业可持续发展的严重障碍。大规模减少其使用以确保粮食供应需要更具创新性和灵活性的生产系统。无农药生产标准汇聚了食品价值链中所有参与者的优势,可能成为这一转型的催化剂。本研究以绿茶为例,采用选择实验方法,调查了消费者对有机和无农药标签的偏好。根据研究结果,有机和无农药标签及品牌都是影响消费者购买决策的主要因素。消费者更愿意为有机标签支付比无农药标签更高的价格。有机标签和无农药标签之间存在替代效应。有机标签与民族品牌、无农药标签与民族品牌之间存在互补效应。消费者信任对消费者选择有机标签和无农药标签有影响。使用无农药标签是特定市场中中小企业降低有机认证成本的一种替代方法。