Chandrasena R
Can J Psychiatry. 1987 May;32(4):259-63. doi: 10.1177/070674378703200402.
One hundred and ninety-eight AMA and 81 AWOL discharged patients were compared with a control group of 256 inpatients. Each group had sociodemographic and clinical characteristics which were predictors of their hospitalization outcome and both AMA/AWOL discharges were at high risk of readmission in the short and long-term following their discharge. These patients occupy a significant amount of hospital resources and have an adverse effect on ward milieu. Their management raises moral, ethical and medicolegal concerns. The data offers a Canadian perspective to the literature and discusses reasons for possible differences between AMA and AWOL discharges. Some remedial measures for the caring of these "revolving door patients" are suggested.
将198例擅自离院(AMA)和81例无故旷工(AWOL)出院患者与256例住院患者的对照组进行了比较。每组都有社会人口统计学和临床特征,这些特征是其住院结局的预测因素,并且AMA/AWOL出院患者在出院后的短期和长期内再次入院的风险都很高。这些患者占用了大量医院资源,并对病房环境产生不利影响。对他们的管理引发了道德、伦理和法医学方面的关注。该数据为文献提供了加拿大视角,并讨论了AMA和AWOL出院患者之间可能存在差异的原因。针对这些“旋转门患者”的护理提出了一些补救措施。