Suppr超能文献

BTR笔式系统从根管中取出不同类型折断器械的效率及其对牙根抗折性的影响。

The Efficiency of the BTR-Pen System in Removing Different Types of Broken Instruments from Root Canals and Its Effect on the Fracture Resistance of Roots.

作者信息

Dulundu Merve, Helvacioglu-Yigit Dilek

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli 41190, Turkey.

College of Dental Medicine, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;15(17):5816. doi: 10.3390/ma15175816.

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the BTR-Pen system in removing different types of instrument fragments from root canals and to assess its effect on fracture resistance of the roots after the removal of the instruments. One hundred thirty human teeth were divided into 10 groups (2 control groups and 8 study groups) according to the localization and type of the fractured fragment as well as the retrieval techniques. Broken instruments were extracted either with BTR-Pen system loops or removed using solely ultrasonic tips. The success rate of instrument removal and consumed time were recorded. All the teeth were subjected to a load at a 1 mm/min rate in a universal testing machine for mechanical testing. The success of removing broken instruments using the BTR-Pen and ultrasonic was 86.7% and 83.3%, respectively (p > 0.05). When the time is compared, the BTR-Pen system (23.97 ± 8.35 min) showed similar results to that of the ultrasonic technique (24.1 ± 8.28 min) (p > 0.05). The BTR-Pen group required less force to fracture than the ultrasonic group (p = 0.024). In conclusion, the BTR-Pen and ultrasonic groups showed no significant difference in terms of the success rate and removal time. The roots that underwent instrument removal using the BTR-Pen system had less fracture resistance.

摘要

该研究旨在评估BTR-Pen系统从根管中取出不同类型器械碎片的效率,并评估其在取出器械后对牙根抗折性的影响。根据折断碎片的位置和类型以及取出技术,将130颗人牙分为10组(2个对照组和8个研究组)。折断的器械要么用BTR-Pen系统环取出,要么仅使用超声尖取出。记录器械取出的成功率和耗时。所有牙齿在万能试验机上以1mm/min的速率加载进行力学测试。使用BTR-Pen和超声取出折断器械的成功率分别为86.7%和83.3%(p>0.05)。比较时间时,BTR-Pen系统(23.97±8.35分钟)与超声技术(24.1±8.28分钟)的结果相似(p>0.05)。BTR-Pen组折断所需的力比超声组小(p=0.024)。总之,BTR-Pen组和超声组在成功率和取出时间方面无显著差异。使用BTR-Pen系统取出器械的牙根抗折性较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f0e/9457077/12e6e6cd395c/materials-15-05816-sch001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验