Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Nov 2;31(11):2063-2069. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0453.
Multivitamin (MVI) use is a common health behavior but there is conflicting evidence from prospective studies about whether this behavior increases or decreases prostate cancer risk.
Associations of MVI use and prostate cancer risk were evaluated using data from the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). Cox proportional hazards models estimated associations of MVI use with risk of total, low-, and high-grade prostate cancer. Longitudinal data were used to evaluate screening and biopsy patterns. To account for differential biopsy patterns, the probability of prostate cancer was estimated for men with a positive screening value but no biopsy. Incidence density ratios were used to approximate HRs, and associations of MVI use with predicted prostate cancer risk were compared with observed.
Analyses of data from observed biopsies suggest a respective 19% (95% confidence interval, 10%-28%) and 21% (12%-31%) higher risk of high-grade prostate cancer for current and long-term MVI use, compared with no use. Current and long-term MVI use was associated with a shorter time to first on-study biopsy, indicating the potential for detection bias. After accounting for differential acceptance of biopsy, associations of MVI use with prostate cancer were attenuated and not statistically significant.
In SELECT, biopsy acceptance patterns differed by MVI use. Estimates of associations of MVI use with prostate cancer risk based on observed biopsy data may be biased by differential acceptance of biopsy.
Differential biopsy ascertainment may impact associations of risk factors and prostate cancer. Detailed screening and biopsy data can be used to analytically minimize such bias.
多种维生素(MVI)的使用是一种常见的健康行为,但前瞻性研究关于这种行为是否增加或降低前列腺癌风险的证据相互矛盾。
使用来自硒和维生素 E 癌症预防试验(SELECT)的数据评估 MVI 使用与前列腺癌风险的关联。Cox 比例风险模型估计了 MVI 使用与总前列腺癌、低级别和高级别前列腺癌风险的关联。使用纵向数据评估了筛查和活检模式。为了考虑到不同的活检模式,对于有阳性筛查值但没有活检的男性,估计了前列腺癌的概率。使用发生率密度比来近似 HR,并将 MVI 使用与预测的前列腺癌风险的关联与观察到的进行比较。
对观察性活检数据的分析表明,与不使用 MVI 相比,当前和长期使用 MVI 与高级别前列腺癌的风险分别增加了 19%(95%置信区间,10%-28%)和 21%(12%-31%)。当前和长期使用 MVI 与首次研究活检的时间更短相关,这表明存在检测偏倚的可能性。在考虑到活检接受程度的差异后,MVI 使用与前列腺癌的关联减弱且无统计学意义。
在 SELECT 中,活检接受模式因 MVI 使用而异。基于观察性活检数据估计的 MVI 使用与前列腺癌风险的关联可能受到活检接受程度的差异的影响。
差异活检确定可能会影响风险因素与前列腺癌的关联。详细的筛查和活检数据可用于分析性地最小化这种偏差。