Suppr超能文献

双耳分听中的认知风格与回忆效应顺序

Cognitive style and order of recall effects in dichotic listening.

作者信息

Mohr E

出版信息

Cortex. 1987 Jun;23(2):223-36. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(87)80033-3.

Abstract

Dichotic listening performance (ear preference and accuracy) was examined as a function of cognitive style and order of recall. In replication of earlier work, a right ear preference was found for free and right ear first recall and a left preference for left ear first recall, thus validating the dichotic instrument used. Cognitive style (field dependence, independence) did not show any systematic differential association with ear preference. Accuracy in contrast varied significantly as a function of cognitive style. Field independent subjects were more accurate than their field dependent counterparts; variability appeared to be due to their greater accuracy in left and right ear first recall conditions, with no apparent group differences under free recall. The order of recall factor was without effect here. No differences emerged between males and females in terms of ear preference, accuracy or cognitive style. In addition, no correlation between handedness and ear preference could be ascertained. The observed lack of influence of the cognitive style variable on lateralization patterns is discussed with respect to earlier assertions to the contrary. Current models of dichotic listening are evaluated in terms of all of the above findings.

摘要

研究了双耳分听表现(耳朵偏好和准确性)作为认知风格和回忆顺序的函数。重复早期的研究工作,发现自由回忆和右耳优先回忆时存在右耳偏好,左耳优先回忆时存在左耳偏好,从而验证了所使用的双耳分听工具。认知风格(场依存性、独立性)与耳朵偏好未显示出任何系统性的差异关联。相比之下,准确性因认知风格而有显著差异。场独立型受试者比场依存型受试者更准确;变异性似乎是由于他们在左耳和右耳优先回忆条件下的更高准确性,自由回忆时没有明显的组间差异。回忆顺序因素在此没有影响。在耳朵偏好、准确性或认知风格方面,男性和女性之间没有差异。此外,未确定利手与耳朵偏好之间的相关性。针对早期相反的断言,讨论了观察到的认知风格变量对偏侧化模式缺乏影响的情况。根据上述所有发现对当前的双耳分听模型进行了评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验