• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优先进行心电图手动复查,以提高心房颤动筛查效率。

Prioritising electrocardiograms for manual review to improve the efficiency of atrial fibrillation screening.

出版信息

Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2022 Jul;2022:3239-3242. doi: 10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871092.

DOI:10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871092
PMID:36086145
Abstract

Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) could reduce the incidence of stroke by identifying undiagnosed AF and prompting anticoagulation. However, screening may involve recording many electrocardiograms (ECGs) from each participant, several of which require manual review which is costly and time-consuming. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the number of ECG reviews could be reduced by using a model to prioritise ECGs for review, whilst still accurately diagnosing AF. A multiple logistic regression model was created to estimate the likelihood of an ECG exhibiting AF based on the mean RR-interval and variability in RR-intervals. It was trained on 1,428 manually labelled ECGs from 144 AF screening programme participants, and evaluated using 11,443 ECGs from 1,521 participants. When using the model to order ECGs for review, the number of reviews for AF participants was reduced by 74% since no further reviews are required after an AF ECG is identified; however, it did not impact the number of reviews in non-AF participants (the vast majority of participants), so the overall number of reviews was reduced by 3% with no missed AF diagnoses. When using the model to also exclude ECGs from review, the overall number of reviews was reduced by 28% with no missed AF diagnoses, and by 53% with only 4% of AF diagnoses missed. In conclusion, the workload can be reduced by using a model to prioritise ECGs for review. Ordering ECGs alone only provides only a moderate reduction in workload. The additional use of a threshold to exclude ECGs from review provides a much greater reduction in workload at the expense of some missed AF diagnoses. Clinical Relevance-This shows the potential benefit of using a model to prioritise electrocardiograms for review in order to reduce the manual workload of AF screening.

摘要

筛查心房颤动 (AF) 可以通过识别未诊断的 AF 并促使抗凝来降低中风的发生率。然而,筛查可能涉及记录每个参与者的许多心电图 (ECG),其中一些需要手动审查,这既昂贵又耗时。本研究旨在探讨是否可以通过使用模型对 ECG 进行优先审查,同时仍准确诊断 AF,从而减少需要进行手动审查的 ECG 数量。创建了一个多逻辑回归模型,根据平均 RR 间隔和 RR 间隔的变异性来估计 ECG 出现 AF 的可能性。它基于来自 144 个 AF 筛查计划参与者的 1,428 个手动标记 ECG 进行训练,并使用来自 1,521 个参与者的 11,443 个 ECG 进行评估。当使用该模型对 ECG 进行审查排序时,由于一旦识别出 AF ECG,就无需再进行进一步的审查,因此 AF 参与者的审查次数减少了 74%;然而,这并不会影响非 AF 参与者(绝大多数参与者)的审查次数,因此总体审查次数减少了 3%,没有错过 AF 诊断。当使用该模型排除审查的 ECG 时,由于没有错过 AF 诊断,因此审查次数总体减少了 28%,而仅漏诊了 4%的 AF 诊断,则审查次数减少了 53%。总之,通过使用模型对 ECG 进行审查排序,可以减少工作量。仅对 ECG 进行排序只能适度减少工作量。额外使用阈值排除审查的 ECG 可以大大减少工作量,但代价是一些 AF 诊断可能会被遗漏。临床意义-这表明在 AF 筛查中使用模型对心电图进行优先排序以减少手动工作量的潜在益处。

相似文献

1
Prioritising electrocardiograms for manual review to improve the efficiency of atrial fibrillation screening.优先进行心电图手动复查,以提高心房颤动筛查效率。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2022 Jul;2022:3239-3242. doi: 10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871092.
2
Lead-I ECG for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with an irregular pulse using single time point testing: a systematic review and economic evaluation.使用单点检测技术的 Lead-I ECG 检测不规则脉搏患者心房颤动:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(3):1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta24030.
3
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: Improving Efficiency of Manual Review of Handheld Electrocardiograms .心房颤动的筛查:提高手持式心电图人工审核的效率
Eng Proc. 2020 Nov 14;2(1):78. doi: 10.3390/ecsa-7-08195. eCollection 2020.
4
Safe automatic one-lead electrocardiogram analysis in screening for atrial fibrillation.安全的自动单导联心电图分析在心房颤动筛查中的应用。
Europace. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):1449-1453. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw286.
5
Reliability of single-lead electrocardiogram interpretation to detect atrial fibrillation: insights from the SAFER feasibility study.单导联心电图解读诊断心房颤动的可靠性:来自 SAFER 可行性研究的见解。
Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae181.
6
Telephone training to improve ECG quality in remote screening for atrial fibrillation.通过电话培训提高远程房颤筛查中心电图的质量。
Physiol Meas. 2024 Dec 17;45(12):125005. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ad9798.
7
Deep Learning of Electrocardiograms in Sinus Rhythm From US Veterans to Predict Atrial Fibrillation.窦性心律心电图的深度学习:来自美国退伍军人的数据预测心房颤动。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Dec 1;8(12):1131-1139. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3701.
8
Automated interpretations of single-lead electrocardiograms predict incident atrial fibrillation: The VITAL-AF trial.单导联心电图自动解读预测心房颤动事件:VITAL-AF 试验。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Sep;21(9):1640-1646. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.085. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
9
A randomized controlled implementation study integrating patient self-screening with a remote central monitoring system to screen community dwellers aged 75 years and older for atrial fibrillation.一项随机对照实施研究,将患者自我筛查与远程中央监测系统相结合,以筛查75岁及以上社区居民的房颤情况。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Dec 23;31(18):2104-2114. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae312.
10
Software-based detection of atrial fibrillation in long-term ECGs.基于软件的长期心电图中心房颤动检测
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jun;11(6):933-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
QRS detection in single-lead, telehealth electrocardiogram signals: Benchmarking open-source algorithms.单导联远程医疗心电图信号中的QRS检测:开源算法基准测试
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Aug 13;3(8):e0000538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000538. eCollection 2024 Aug.