• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者心脏电子设备植入术后对日常活动的了解、信息需求和生活质量。

Patient's knowledge of daily activities, need for information and quality of life after cardiac electronic device implantation.

机构信息

Students' Scientific Group at the 1st Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

1st Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Folia Med Cracov. 2022 Jun 29;62(1):121-134. doi: 10.24425/fmc.2022.141695.

DOI:10.24425/fmc.2022.141695
PMID:36088597
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) such as pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators prevent dangerous heart arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities. Post-intervention education is crucial in the patient recovery process and aims to avoid both dangerous behavior and unnecessary restraints in daily living.

OBJECTIVE

The evaluation of knowledge of daily activities' safety among patients with CIEDs and an analysis of the relationship between the state of knowledge and perceived post-intervention quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group included 100 patients (57% men) with CIEDs, recruited in the University Hospital in Kraków. Data on the patients' knowledge about permissible daily activities, medical procedures and perceived quality of life was collected using a dedicated questionnaire, which comprised 57 simple and multiple-choice questions.

RESULTS

The analyzed group included patients aged 28 to 97 years (mean age 73). Among them, 26% either have not received or have not read the information booklet. Two-thirds of them either need more information about their device (51%) or do not possess essential knowledge (15%). Patients raised concerns about performing daily activities such as: car-driving (38%), using seat belts (14%), bathing (15%), returning to work (51%) or climbing stairs (16%). They reported anxiety when using computers (39%), mobile phones (51%), microwaves (73%) and even electric toothbrushes (51%). It has been observed that patients with a greater general understanding of the pacemaker and post-implantation restraints had a higher quality of life on average.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CIEDs restrain themselves excessively in daily living. There is a strong need to provide them with knowledge of their medical condition, concomitant capabilities, and limitations to undergo a fully successful rehabilitation. Comprehensive and easily comprehensible recommendations may play a key role in improving patients' quality of life.

摘要

简介

心脏植入式电子设备(CIED),如起搏器或除颤器,可预防危险的心律失常和传导异常。术后教育在患者康复过程中至关重要,旨在避免日常生活中既危险的行为和不必要的限制。

目的

评估 CIED 患者对日常活动安全性的认知,并分析知识状态与感知术后生活质量之间的关系。

材料和方法

研究组包括 100 名在克拉科夫大学医院接受 CIED 治疗的患者(57%为男性)。使用专门的问卷收集患者对允许的日常活动、医疗程序和感知生活质量的知识数据,该问卷包含 57 个简单和多项选择题。

结果

分析组包括年龄在 28 至 97 岁之间的患者(平均年龄为 73 岁)。其中,26%的患者要么没有收到过,要么没有阅读过信息手册。三分之二的患者要么需要更多关于他们设备的信息(51%),要么没有掌握基本的知识(15%)。患者对日常活动存在担忧,如:驾驶汽车(38%)、使用安全带(14%)、洗澡(15%)、重返工作岗位(51%)或爬楼梯(16%)。他们在使用电脑(39%)、手机(51%)、微波炉(73%)甚至电动牙刷(51%)时会感到焦虑。观察到,对起搏器和植入后限制有更全面理解的患者平均生活质量更高。

结论

CIED 患者在日常生活中过度限制自己。强烈需要向他们提供有关其病情、伴随能力和限制的知识,以实现全面成功的康复。全面且易于理解的建议可能对改善患者的生活质量起着关键作用。

相似文献

1
Patient's knowledge of daily activities, need for information and quality of life after cardiac electronic device implantation.患者心脏电子设备植入术后对日常活动的了解、信息需求和生活质量。
Folia Med Cracov. 2022 Jun 29;62(1):121-134. doi: 10.24425/fmc.2022.141695.
2
CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE INFECTIONS - PREVENTION, DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND IMPACT ON QUALITY OF LIFE.心脏植入式电子设备感染 - 预防、诊断、治疗和对生活质量的影响。
Georgian Med News. 2021 May(314):99-106.
3
Patients' knowledge and attitudes regarding living with implantable electronic devices: results of a multicentre, multinational patient survey conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association.患者对植入式电子设备的认知和态度:一项由欧洲心律协会进行的多中心、跨国患者调查结果。
Europace. 2018 Feb 1;20(2):386-391. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux365.
4
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Therapy: Permanent Pacemakers, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Devices.心脏植入式电子设备治疗:永久性起搏器、植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗装置。
Med Clin North Am. 2019 Sep;103(5):931-943. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
5
The influence of age on the psychological profile of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: results from the Italian population in a multicenter study conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association.年龄对植入式心脏电子设备患者心理特征的影响:欧洲心律协会多中心研究中意大利人群的结果。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Sep;31(9):1219-1226. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1088-5. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
Complications arising from cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention for the clinician.心脏植入式电生理设备引发的并发症:临床医生对流行病学、发病机制及预防的综述
Postgrad Med. 2016;128(2):223-30. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1151327. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
7
The gap between what patients know and desire to learn about their cardiac implantable electronic devices.患者对心脏植入式电子设备的了解程度与他们期望学习的内容之间存在差距。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;43(1):118-122. doi: 10.1111/pace.13850. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
8
Why We Need Postmortem Analysis of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.为什么我们需要对心脏植入式电子设备进行尸检分析。
J Forensic Sci. 2016 Jul;61(4):988-92. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13075. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
Safety of lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the functioning of cardiac implantable electronic devices.肺立体定向消融放疗对心脏植入式电子设备功能的安全性。
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Mar;156:193-198. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.12.029. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
10
Sex-Based Differences in Selected Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Use: A 10-Year Statewide Patient Cohort.基于性别的心脏植入式电子设备使用差异:一项为期 10 年的全州患者队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):e025428. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025428. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Needs and Preferences for Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation: A Qualitative Study on Disease and Medical Device Characteristics to Inform a Quantitative Preference Study.心脏起搏器植入患者的需求与偏好:一项关于疾病和医疗设备特征的定性研究,为定量偏好研究提供信息。
Patient. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00767-1.
2
Barriers and Enablers to Routine Clinical Implementation of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Remote Monitoring in Australia Among Cardiologists, Cardiac Physiologists, Nurses, and Patients: Interview Study.澳大利亚心脏病学家、心脏生理学家、护士和患者对心脏植入式电子设备远程监测进行常规临床应用的障碍与促进因素:访谈研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Jul 18;9:e67758. doi: 10.2196/67758.
3
Partnering RemoTe monitoring of Implanted Cardiac devices with Intelligent PATient Engagement - PARTICIPATE trial: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
远程监测植入式心脏设备与智能患者参与相结合 - PARTICIPATE 试验:一项随机对照试验的方案。
Open Heart. 2024 Nov 27;11(2):e002763. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002763.