• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创中央胰腺切除术的短期和长期结果:与微创保留脾脏的远端胰腺次全切除术的比较。

Short and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: Comparison with minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomy.

作者信息

Jung Dawn, Bari Hassaan, Hwang Ho Kyoung, Lee Woo Jung, Kang Chang Moo

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, South Korea; Pancreatobiliary Cancer Clinic, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2023 Feb;46(2):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.08.084. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.08.084
PMID:36089433
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central pancreatectomy(CP) is more complex surgery and higher complication rate than distal pancreatectomy(DP). However, with the development of minimally invasive surgery, CP has become a safer surgery technique. In this study, we compare minimally invasive CP(MI-CP) and Minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal DP(MI-SpSTDP) to figure out the short-term and long-term outcomes of MI-CP.

METHODS

From March 2007 to June 2020, 36 cases of MI-SpSTDP and 23 cases of MI-CP were performed for benign and borderline malignant pancreatic tumors in Severance hospital. The occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) and Clavian-Dindo classification grade 3 or more in the two group was investigated, and the Controlling nutritional status scores(CONUT score) before and 1-year after surgery were compared to determine the long-term outcomes of exocrine function.

RESULTS

There was no difference in postoperative complications including POPF between the two groups(17.4% vs 5.1%, p = 0.294). And there were no statistical differences in either the MI-CP group (0.74 ± 0.75 vs. 0.78 ± 0.99, p = 0.803) or the MI-SpSTDP group (0.86 ± 0.83 to 0.61 ± 0.59, p = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

MI-CP had longer operation time and hospital stay and is safe and effective in preserving endocrine and exocrine functions in treatment of benign or borderline tumors located at the neck or proximal body of the pancreas.

摘要

背景

与胰体尾切除术(DP)相比,全胰切除术(CP)是一种更复杂的手术,并发症发生率更高。然而,随着微创手术的发展,CP已成为一种更安全的手术技术。在本研究中,我们比较了微创全胰切除术(MI-CP)和微创保留脾脏的胰体尾次全切除术(MI-SpSTDP),以明确MI-CP的短期和长期疗效。

方法

2007年3月至2020年6月,Severance医院对36例MI-SpSTDP和23例MI-CP患者进行了良性和交界性恶性胰腺肿瘤手术。调查两组术后胰瘘(POPF)的发生情况以及Clavian-Dindo分类3级及以上情况,并比较术前和术后1年的控制营养状态评分(CONUT评分),以确定外分泌功能的长期疗效。

结果

两组术后包括POPF在内的并发症无差异(17.4%对5.1%,p = 0.294)。MI-CP组(0.74±0.75对0.78±0.99,p = 0.803)和MI-SpSTDP组(0.86±0.83对0.61±0.59,p = 0.071)均无统计学差异。

结论

MI-CP手术时间和住院时间更长,在治疗位于胰腺颈部或体部近端的良性或交界性肿瘤时,在保留内分泌和外分泌功能方面安全有效。

相似文献

1
Short and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: Comparison with minimally invasive spleen-preserving subtotal distal pancreatectomy.微创中央胰腺切除术的短期和长期结果:与微创保留脾脏的远端胰腺次全切除术的比较。
Asian J Surg. 2023 Feb;46(2):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.08.084. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Central Pancreatectomy Versus Distal Pancreatectomy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Benign and Low-Grade Malignant Neoplasms: A Retrospective and Propensity Score-Matched Study with Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Pancreas Volumetry.胰腺中段切除术与胰远端切除术和胰十二指肠切除术治疗良性和低级别恶性肿瘤:一项回顾性和倾向评分匹配研究,具有长期功能结局和胰腺体积测量。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Apr;27(4):1215-1224. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08095-z. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
3
Minimally invasive vessel-preservation spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy-how I do it, tips and tricks and clinical results.微创保留血管脾脏的胰体尾切除术——我的手术方法、技巧和临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7024-7038. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10173-z. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
4
Reduced port minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: single-port laparoscopic versus robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy.经皮肾镜碎石取石术:标准通道与微通道经皮肾镜碎石取石术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1091-1099. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6361-3. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
5
Minimally invasive versus open central pancreatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放中央型胰腺切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2022 Nov;172(5):1490-1501. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.024. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
6
Is Central Pancreatectomy Truly Recommendable? A 9-Year Single-Center Experience.中央胰腺切除术真的值得推荐吗?一项为期9年的单中心经验。
Dig Surg. 2018;35(6):532-538. doi: 10.1159/000485806. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
7
Surgical approach to solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the proximal pancreas: minimally invasive vs. open.胰腺近端实性假乳头状瘤的手术入路:微创与开放。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep 12;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1684-7.
8
Comparison between robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy and robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant tumours located in the neck of the pancreas: A propensity score matched study.机器人辅助胰体中部切除术与机器人辅助胰尾部切除术治疗胰腺颈部良性或低度恶性肿瘤的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Jun;17(3):e2219. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2219. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
9
Long term outcome after minimally invasive and open Warshaw and Kimura techniques for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: International multicenter retrospective study.保脾胰体尾切除术微创与开腹 Warshaw 和 Kimura 技术的长期结果:国际多中心回顾性研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;45(9):1668-1673. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
10
Minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: current status and future directions.微创胰体尾切除术:现状与未来方向。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Dec;21(12):831-40. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.143. Epub 2014 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
ArtiSential laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis with robotic single-port cholecystectomy.ArtiSential腹腔镜胆囊切除术:与机器人单孔胆囊切除术的对比分析。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 Dec;107(6):336-345. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.6.336. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
2
Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy versus open central pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创胰体尾切除术与开腹胰体尾切除术的安全性和有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3531-3546. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10900-0. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023.
《2023年机器人胰腺手术国际共识指南》
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):89-104. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-132. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Recent trends in organ-preserving pancreatectomy: Its problems and clinical advantages compared with other standard pancreatectomies.保留器官的胰腺切除术的最新趋势:与其他标准胰腺切除术相比的问题及临床优势。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 Oct 8;8(1):8-20. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12746. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Robotic Parenchymal-Sparing Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review.机器人保留实质的胰腺切除术:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 1;15(17):4369. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174369.
6
Minimally invasive radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: routine vs. modified.微创顺行模块化胰脾切除术:常规术式与改良术式对比
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Dec 15;25(4):121-126. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.121.